Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 13:39:07 -0800 (PST) From: shawn214-AT-pseud.pseud Subject: Re: M-INTRO: "Spirit of Marxism" Rock on Neolib! I agree with everything you said. Although I am an atheist (really more a philosophical materialist who finds the question of god irrelevant) i recognize that the influence of Christ on the goals of socialism is undeniable (and many early socialists were ardent christians, Proudhon, saint-simone, etc). The article that you posted is indeed bizarre, where did you get it from? And why did you pick neolib for an email title? I associate that with the ideology of an important sector of the reactionary period in which we live. have a nice holiday shawn214 --- Neolib-AT-pseud.pseud wrote: > > So this is what we have been doing all semester? I > found the article below online and found in quite > interesting. It is amazing to me how anything that > challenges the “status quo” is automatically assumed > to be “evil.” > > First off, I certainly don’t consider myself an > anti-intellectual, but rather one who promotes > progressive thought. In fact, an anti-intellectual > in my mind is someone who would propose something as > preposterous as “the bible in the classroom.” Not > because I disagree (hate is his word) with the > values that are conveyed in the bible, (I am a > Christian, that is silly) but because it violates > the principles of freedom and democracy NOT enforces > them. > > To say that Marxism is driven by hatred is > counterfactual. To imply that Marxist’s want to > destroy and “hate the family” is borderline absurd. > One thing that I do agree with, and that is the > statement that many Marxist’s want to remove > students from the values held by their forefathers. > YES, this is the goal of many…. > > To awaken humankind to the misplaced values and > actions of our forefathers is an honorable goal. I > see no role for capitalist exploitation, > institutional/race based slavery, gender inequality, > child labor, environmental destruction, > patriarchy/hedgeonomy, elitism, pre-emptive WAR, > etc….You be the judge? Are these embraced values > that should be continued? And if so, should it be in > a classroom (indoctrination) environment? > > Breaking down these “un-godly” values is positive > work, and to me is the true “Spirit of Marxism at > Work.” Not the drivel contained below…. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > The Spirit of Marxism at Work > There's more involved in this curriculum controversy > than the natural conclusions of relativism, however. > At the core of this argument is a desire on the part > of some educators to tear down everything that the > West stands for. > > Although Marxists talk a great deal about the > positive goals of their world mission - to rebuild > or reconstruct society - we have yet to see anything > positive happen after a Marxist revolution. The very > nature of Marxism is destructive: it produces > poverty, genocide, and economic collapse ... and > then institutes a slave state on top of the rubble. > > The motivating force at work in Marx, Lenin, and > Engels was hatred and the desire to destroy: hatred > of the family, hatred of private property, hatred of > wealth, hatred of individual reward. These men had > no plan or program for rebuilding what they wanted > to tear down. Their revolution was not redemptive, > simply vindictive. This is because hatred cannot > produce anything positive. Evil cannot beget good. > > The anti-intellectuals in our academic community who > are challenging the curriculum requirements at > Stanford and other universities are being motivated > by this same Marxist doctrine. They cannot allow the > Bible, the plays of Shakespeare, the essays of > Hamilton, or the poems of Longfellow to be read in > the classroom because they hate the values that > these writings convey. They hate biblical morality > (the strongest single influence in Western culture), > the concepts of freedom and democracy, and all the > other contributions of Western history that have > built free and prosperous nations. > > The whole goal of the new Marxist, anti-Western > curriculum is to remove today's student from the > values of our forefathers. They want to uproot an > entire generation of young people from their > entrenchment in the "narrow-minded" Western ideas of > morality, property, and individual freedom under > God. Then, when the operation is complete, they can > interject their new, revolutionary ideas. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > What sh*t!….. Why is it revolutionary to question > and critique a system which is fundamentally > (intuitively even) flawed? Do not results speak for > themselves? Why perpetuate fallacies…? > > Conservative or neo-nazis (classical) reply? Let > your rigid orthodoxy shine…. > > Merry Christmas, > rr > > > > > --- from list > marxism-intro-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now http://companion.yahoo.com/ --- from list marxism-intro-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005