From: GFunk-AT-pseud.pseud Subject: M-INTRO: More on Assumptions Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 02:21:13 -0600 It is nice that someone (bobcat) thought this question was interesting, because I was quite reluctant to bring it up. Well then, I have more questions and notions that have been plaguing my mind for quite awhile. At least in my opinion, most arguments for or against any one kind of social order, etc. seem to be pretty superficial which causes distraction and leaves the conversation going in circles. I want to argue as logically as possible so I always ask for the assumptions driving the persons argumentation. These assumptions, in my mind, should all somehow directly relate to prevalent patterns that exist in human nature (ie hunger) and the inherent relations between people (ie the innate need for companionship and at the same time distance, etc). I know this is quite a meaty issue, but it is the one I always find myself comming back to. For instance, one of socialism's premises is that the means of production be owned communally, because of the assumption that everyone is intrinsically equal in value, therefore no one should wield the right to exploit someone else. I would like some sort of list, or something to that effect, that describes the basic assumptions that would be necessary in order for a specific social model to hold. _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ --- from list marxism-intro-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005