From: akudiya-AT-pseud.pseud Subject: RE: M-INTRO: Hockey Strike Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 16:09:07 -0400 If they are overpaid, then who should get the money? In this society, owners maximize and in the end, is it wrong for the players to maximize as well. I hear this argument all the time and it makes me sick, since the owners are just getting fatter and fatter. I am not going to game to watch an owner, I will pay market value to see a great player. That player should get his fair share of market value for what he brings to the team financially. Original Message: ----------------- From: tincop-AT-pseud.pseud Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 19:48:11 +0000 To: marxism-intro-AT-lists.village.Virginia.EDU Subject: RE: M-INTRO: Hockey Strike When talking about the hockey strike I think that the owners should be able to pay the players whatever they want. I think that in todays society sports are not what they used to be. In the old days people played football, baseball,basketball, hockey because they loved the sport not just the money. You can see the difference in todays sports. people don't live to play they just like the money. In my own opinion I think that all sports players are over paid. I think that if the hockey owners hold strong and the strike doesn't end. who cares!!! fire all of the pro hockey players that won't play for less money take kids from college who love the game and let them play. _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ --- from list marxism-intro-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ . --- from list marxism-intro-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005