Date: Sat, 19 Oct 1996 17:50:09 -0500 (EST)
From: Alberto Fergusson <aferguss-AT-zeus.uniandes.edu.co>
Subject: Re: Identifying forum in Subject line: m-psy


I agree. Lets use m-psy as Bob young suggests. Alberto FergussonOn Sat, 19 
Oct 1996, Robert Maxwell Young wrote:

>         I would like to make a suggestion/request. I have seen two messages
> today referring to other messages sent to this forum which I have not seen
> and cannot find. (I accept that they may be lost in a sea of email.)
>          I wonder if we could make it a habit to put an acronym in the
> 'Subject' line indicating the name of the forum, say, m-psy.
>         That way I and others would know that it is a message from this
> forum. It may be that my (Eudora) software is deficient, but it only
> indicates the name of the sender, not the forum. (I know I cold put things
> straight into a mailbox, but I like to peruse all my conciderable mail
> before putting it into mailboxes.)
>         Other forums I'm on indicate themselves in the subject line : pps
> (psychoanalysis & pub lic sphere), SaC (science as culture) , ptp
> (psychotherapy practice).
> Bob Young
> 
> __________________________________________
> Robert Maxwell Young:  robert-AT-rmy1.demon.co.uk  26 Freegrove Rd., London N7
> 9RQ, Eng. tel.+44 171 607 8306  fax.+44 171 609 4837 Professor of
> Psychotherapy and Psychoanalytic Studies, Centre for Psychotherapeutic
> Studies, University of  Sheffield. Home page and writings:
> http://www.shef.ac.uk/~psysc/  Process Press publications:
> http://www.shef.ac.uk/~psysc/process_press/index.html
>  'One must imagine Sisyphus happy.' - Camus
> 
> 
> 
> 
>      --- from list marxism-psych-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
> 


     --- from list marxism-psych-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---