Date: Fri, 21 Nov 1997 12:15:05 -0500 (EST)
From: Gerald Levy <glevy-AT-pratt.edu>
Subject: Re: M-TH: Surplus value


Doug H wrote:

> I think that one reason it would be wrong to call Marx an
> "underconsumptionist" on the basis of this quote is that there's nothing
> short of revolution that could fix it.

Yet, Rob quotes you as saying, in _Wall Street_, that Marx was a
"theorist of underconsumption."  Which is it -- was Marx an
underconsumptionist or not?       

Jerry



     --- from list marxism-thaxis-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---