From: Carrol Cox <cbcox-AT-rs6000.cmp.ilstu.edu> Subject: M-TH: Report on Oil. March Scientific American Date: Sat, 14 Feb 1998 12:48:37 -0600 (CST) The *Scientific American* which arrived today (March 1998) has the following in its Table of Contents (I have not looked at the articles yet). Special Report: PREVENTING THE NEXT OIL CRUNCH Global production of oil from conventional sources is likely to peak and decline permanently during the next decade, according to the thoughtful analyses. In these articles industry experts explain why and describe technologies that could cushion the shock of a new energy crisis. THE END OF CHEAP OIL by Colin J. Campbell and Jean H. Leberrere Forecasts about the abundance of oil are usually warped by inconsistent definitions of "reserves." In truth, every year for the past two decades the industry has pumped more oil than it has discovered, and production will soon be unable to keep up with rising demand. MINING FOR OIL by Richard L. George Tarry sands and shales in Canada alone hold more than 300 billion barrels of petroleum, more than Saudi Arabia's reserves. Some companies can now extractr that oil economically, while addressing environmental concerns over open-pit mining. [!!??] OIL PRODUCTION IN THE 21ST CENTURY by Roger N. Anderson Tracking the flow of underground crude, pressurizing dead wells and steering drills horizontally will open reserves under the deep ocean LIQUID FUELS FROM NATURAL GAS by Safaa A. Fouda Liquefied as gasoline, mecthanol or diesel fuel, natural gas can buffer the coming decline in crude oil. Technological improvements are making this conversion cheaper and more efficient. =================================================== Correct me if I am wrong: so far under capitalism the promises of "no environmental damage" from any form of resource extraction have *never* been fulfilled? Carrol --- from list marxism-thaxis-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005