Date: Sat, 14 Feb 98 14:41:30 EST From: boddhisatva <kbevans-AT-panix.com> Subject: Re: M-TH: Rev Thomas Malthus returns C. Proyect, Fish are not non-renewable. Neither are cuttlefish or crabs. They are at the top of their food chains and as long as there is a bottom to their food chains, they will come back. If people ate plankton directly, there might be cause for concern. Long-term degradation of their environments with heavy metals, slow-degrading organics, concrete and asphalt are the only things that structurally change fish stocks over the long term. Reef fishing with dynamite and cyanide (mostly performed by the same kind of down-and-out operators with no jobs who suck piddling amounts of gold from Amazon rivers and spread mercury all around) is also worrisome because coral reefs are hothouses for species diversification. Pelagic fish species like swordfish are impossible to fish out entirely, and it is impossible, obviously, to destroy their environment. Ditto midwater and deep water species. Cod habitat has been degraded, but they essentially have just been fished into uneconomic sizes and numbers. It will take decades for fish stocks to return to their previous levels. Meanwhile all those boatmen in Gloucester will deservedly go broke and their boats will rust out. Fuck 'em, it's not like they didn't get warned. Finally, the Japanese will be spending so much money on fish that they might realize that aquaculture is the way to go. Some African country will probably have to sink a Japanese drift-netter with a missile before that happens, however. Do what I do: eat farm-raised catfish. peace p.s. - Freshwater fish are far more imperiled, so much so that I fear people have simply given up on them. --- from list marxism-thaxis-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005