From: Carrol Cox <cbcox-AT-rs6000.cmp.ilstu.edu> Subject: Re: M-TH: Picking up the Pieces Date: Tue, 31 Mar 1998 13:48:15 -0600 (CST) Boddhisatva writes: > Yoshie wrote: "Much of seeming heterosexuality, I think, is a > result of economic relations, ideology, etc.", but obviously she wasn't > serious. I would assume she was quite serious--and also probably correct in her description. Sexual satisfaction (however defined) clearly can be the result of innumerable different activities. Procreation, I dare say, is a side effect of some but not most of these 'activities.' After all, the very term "heterosexuality" only came into existence when it became at least potentially possible for men and women openly to disregard procreation in their sexual activity. Why shouldn't she be serious? Carrol --- from list marxism-thaxis-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005