Subject: Re: M-TH: Reform and Revolution Date: Mon, 9 Mar 1998 19:13:45 -0500 (EST) From: "hoov" <hoov-AT-freenet.tlh.fl.us> > Well, the very idea of actually instigating a reform, rather than merely > delaying the death of one our mums and dads won for us, seems revolutionary > all by itself just now. > Rob. about two decades before he bid adieu to the working class, Andre Gorz suggested a difference between 'reformist' reforms & 'revolutionary' reforms (_Strategy for Labor_)...the former subordinates objectives to the present system and rejects demands incompatible with preserving that system...the latter is conceived not in terms of the 'cult of the possible' but what should be made possible in terms of human needs and demands...in other words, anti-capitalist reforms not predicated upon capitalist needs, criteria, rationales... surely Marx had some like 'revolutionary reforms' in mind when he called the 10 Hrs. Bill a victory for the political economy of the working class... today, perhaps, the difference between ESOPs and certain kinds of producer/worker coops?...Michael Hoover --- from list marxism-thaxis-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005