From: LeoCasey <LeoCasey-AT-aol.com> Date: Sat, 28 Mar 1998 10:34:34 EST Subject: M-TH: List Dynamics In a message dated 98-03-28 03:39:58 EST, Rob writes: <<I gotta go along with Boddhi - I'd gone through Mark's post with as close to a co-mod's eye as I could muster at the time, and was most surprised to see charges of homophobia levelled at it. What am I supposed to be missing? >> I had been keeping my distance from this one, but maybe some views from the sideline could be helpful. I agree that the posting could be read more than one way, and the more uncharitable interpretation was immediately jumped upon. There obviously is a history to some of the interaction on this list, and given Mark's status as an unapologetic Stalinist and others' status as unapologetic Trotskyists, a state of more or less permanent discursive war exists among them. The more uncharitable interpretation was immediately seized upon as a weapon in that war. IMO, Justin took their interpretation as correct without examining it too closely, and got himself in the middle of that war without realizing all of the implications. Although Mark has come to expect such things out of his Trot adversaries, he was surprised and hurt that it came from Justin, and responded with a series of not very helpful personal tirades, compounding the problem. My conclusions: we toss about all too carelessly accusations of racism, sexism/misogyny, homophobia, fascism and such on this list. Such accusations are clearly the type of personal attacks that lead to flame wars. Just as importantly, they really make it impossible for us to learn from each other and grow in our understanding. I think it altogether possible that Mark had not considered or thought through the ways in which his question raised the spectre of homophobic stereotypes of rich, powerful, self-absorbed gay men, and that a different approach might have allowed him to come to understand this without feeling personally under fire. I also think that when we discuss issues of sexuality honestly, we should realize that we are in an area in which many of us will feel vulnerable, and move with a little more care than usual. Well over twenty-five years ago, when I was a eighteen year old freshman in college, I used the word 'oriental' to describe Asian people in a classroom discussion. In a way that I will never forget, a Maoist in the back of the room immediately launched into a tirade about "racist motherfuckers." I was in a state of shock, since I had not a clue at the time that the term 'oriental' was considered an offensive and racist term. If I had, I never would have used it. I do not know if I would ever spoken another word in that class if it were not for others in the class who pointed out that that the offensiveness of the term was not common knowledge, that they were also unaware of the implications of the term, and that asked for an explanation of why it was offensive. Leo --- from list marxism-thaxis-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005