Date: Thu, 21 Jul 94 09:37:43 EDT From: Adrian Kelly <3AMK6-AT-QUCDN.QueensU.CA> Subject: intro, remarks, requests Hi. I've been lurking for a while, wary of the possibility that I may have little to contribute to the current debates due to my woefully inadequate knowledge of 'orthodox' or 'classic' Marxism. I have been slow to come around to Marxism (at least as a methodological ally), stepping in through the side door of literary-cultural theory (Fredric Jameson, R. Williams, Terry Eagleton, and of course Lukacs) and some recent study of the Frankfurt School which fostered an ongoing interest in Marxist-psycho- analytic theory (Deleuze and Guattari primarily). This research forms the theoretical core of my doctoral dissertation which, through a comparative reading of the contemporary American novelist Thomas Pynchon and the South African writer J.M.Coetzee, examines inter-relationships between war, imperialism, sexuality, and technology. I also compare the poetics of resistance which each writer develops against this complex of forces (which I suppose form a rough quadrilateral map of the main mechanisms of social regulation), which leads me into a re-examination of literature's place, function, use, practical value within a mushrooming technical super- structure that gladly promotes literature's exchange value while minimizing its use value etc. This brings me back to the recent debates on dialectics, and art's place within dialectical process. I am currently trying to work through Marcuse's thoughts on literature (which seem to me anticipate Jameson's The Political Unconscious) in E &C and ODM, where he argues that literature, if it is crtical, oppositional, can work -only- by negation, ie, only by re-affirming that which it criticizes and pretends to offer an imaginative alternative to. This applies especially to mimetic forms and genres which are kinds of social contracts formed within existing captialist-bourgeouis social relations, and act as a kind of cap or governing super-ego of a text's oppostional content. To Marcuse it is only non-conventinal forms such as surrealism which offer any hope of imaginative transformation, ie,it seems, that can be properly dialectical in that they do not work by mere negation. (In ODM, however, Marcuse does suggest that it may not be possible to write in a non-reified language). Marcuse's comments seem to anticipate the advent of postmodern literature. Both Pynchon and Coetzee are generally regarded as 'postmodern' in style and in politics, although the politics of postmodernism is a particularly gruesome can of worms which I don't want to open at the moment except to say that Marxist literary critics certainly do -not- regard postmodernism positively; to crudely sum up Jameson, pomo is a commodified, reified, spectacular aesthetic divested of any truly oppostional potential (the emptying out of historical-dialectical process?). I do not -want- to agree with Jameson, but this is largely due to a persistent faith in the potential of imaginative literature, and what I think is the actuality of 'non-reified' form (if there can truly be such a thing) to be found in P and C and others like them (ecriture feminine for example), a form which does seem to be 'dialectical' in that it contains the opposing term, recognizes its complicity within and dependence upon it as a predicate of evolution. This itself is debatable in that P and C also seem to me at times to abjure dialectical thinking as symptomatic of merely an imaginative reconciliation of opposites that paralyzes social critique. My apologies for some self-indulgent rambling, but I hope that those of you more fluent with Marxism than I may offer some suggestions, your views on the transformative potentials of art, art and the dialectical process, the potentialities of marxist-psychoanalytic discourse (something from which I digressed above, but which really interests me at the moment, ie the writing of desire, the poetics of embodiment, etc) and so on. Thanks, Adrian Kelly ------------------
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005