Date: Fri, 30 Dec 1994 00:47:55 -0800 From: jones/bhandari <djones-AT-uclink.berkeley.edu> Subject: MOISHE POSTONE "Labor is central to Marx's analysis not because he assumes material production as such to be the most important aspect of social life or the essence of human society, but because he considers the peculiarly abstract and directionally dynamic character of capitalist society to be its central hallmark, and maintains that those basic features could be grasped and elucidated in terms of the historically specific nature of labor in that society. Through his analysis of that historically specific nature, Marx seeks to clarify and to ground socially an abstract form of social relations and of domination as characteristic of capitalism. His critique does so in a way that shows capitalism to be a totality that is intrinsically contradictory, and thus immanently dynamic." (p.104-5) Only about half way through it, I haven't been able to put down Moishe Postone's Time, Labor and Social Domination: a reinterpretation of Marx's critical theory (Cambridge, 1993). In my humble opinion this seems to be one of the most audacious interpretations of Marx's basic concepts since the classical attempts of G Lukacs, II Rubin and H Grossmann -- all of whom are critically appropriated. (It is very useful to compare Postone on the historically specific nature of labor with Grossmann's 1941 "Marx, Classical Economics and Dynamics" reprinted in Capital and Class in 1977). Postone also engages P Bourdieu, M Sahlins, A Gorz, J Habermas, the Frankfurt School, D Harvey, J Elster, E Mandel, P Sweezy, L Althusser, D Sayer, P Murray and many others. Does anyone want to talk about this book? It seems to touch upon most of the discussions which have been carried out on this line (with the possible exceptions of Chris S' Hayekian critique; also as Postone is working at the abstract level of the most basic categories of the capitalist system, he doesn't seem to write much about the imperialist world market, but such a method of presentation has been used before!) Any thoughts on Time, Labor and Social Domination--the book begins after all as a severe critique of what Postone calls traditional Marxism, most notably represented by Maurice Dobb. Postone has surely stimulated much rethinking on my part. Does anyone know of any reviews? I must say that Chris Arthur's review in the last issue of Capital and Class does not in my opinion even hint at the richness of this work. ------------------
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005