File spoon-archives/marxism.archive/marxism_1994/94-12-31.000, message 39


Date: Fri, 9 Dec 1994 01:28:42 -0500 (EST)
From: "Jonathan P. Beasley-Murray" <jpb8-AT-acpub.duke.edu>
Subject: Re: Birmingham Sch. and first instance


Tom:

Thanks for the quotation and the citation.  I think I mangled somewhat
Hall's argument originally (but then I was only guessing from the one
sentence I remembered--and once again it's great to have the full thing
presented to us). 

My first thought (which does go with what I was trying to suggest 
earlier, however) is that this fits in with an earlier thread I tried to 
start about totality--or maybe not.  Is marxism's tendency towards 
certainty the same as its drive towards totality?

To put it another way, one of the (great? attractive?) things about 
being a marxist--it seems to me--is that you're always right.  This 
certainty is embedded in the rhetoric, the scientificity, but also in the 
comprehensive scope most marxisms aspire to, as well as the (ruthless) 
drive to "ideology critique" and the "exposure" of "false consciousness."

Of course each marxist tends to be certain of his or her rightness in his 
or her own way--and this is (one of) the path(s) to left sectarianism.

On the other hand, Hall's argument for an "open marxism" (and I know I'm
stealing that phrase somewhat out of context), at the same time as being
an argument against the theoretical or epistemological "second coming" 
that marxism sometimes likes to present itself as, is also both an
argument against totalization, and for an openness toward feminist and
other progressive analyses and against the economic as sole determinant of
the cultural. 

On Thu, 8 Dec 1994, Thomas Schumacher wrote:

> Now I think that there are those who are trying to recover what cultural 
> studies got rid of when they purged the political economists.  Folks like 
> Golding and Murdock and Nicholas Garnham are headed in that direction -- more 
> like reconstructed political economists.

I'd like to know a little more about the people you mention here.  I'm 
familiar with Garnham, who I think is great (and came to a conference I 
helped organize once as an undergrad)--but I don't know so much about 
Golding and Murdock.
 
> Tom Schumacher

Take care

Jon

Jon Beasley-Murray
Literature Program
Duke University
jpb8-AT-acpub.duke.edu



     ------------------

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005