Date: Sat, 17 Dec 94 15:58:44 GMT From: Chris Burford <cburford-AT-gn.apc.org> Subject: Beware "determin... Beware "Determin..." I would like to contribute something fuller, but because of time I will contribute the one point in this exciting debate that I wish to be sure people have heard. In maths and in dynamical systems theory, words beginning with "determin" have virtually nothing to do with the 19th century debate about free will and determinism. It is a different discourse (to be post modernist). There has been a bifurcation of associations (to look at it from the point of view of systems theory). There is a different meaning in the dictionary (to be semantic). That was the specific purpose of my first intervention in this forum where I wanted to quote the way the words are used in thoughtful but popular science journalism like "Turbulent Mirror" by John Briggs and David Peat: "complete determinism, that is you can determine all the terms going into the equation" and "suddenly Lorenz and other scientists became aware that in deterministic (causal) dynamical systems, the potential for generating chaos (unpredictability) crouches in every detail." In the natural world there is no such thing as a deterministic process *by definition* because we can never shut out all other variables. (The insights that come from these simple mathematical models however, are every bit as interesting for what they imply about non-linear processes in the biological world of human society as Ron suggests. They are consistent I believe with much of the approach of Marx and Engels.) Chris Burford, London. ------------------
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005