File spoon-archives/marxism.archive/marxism_1994/marxism_19Jul.94, message 39


Date: Thu, 21 Jul 94 13:36:47 EST
From: WCECIL-AT-ucs.indiana.edu
Subject: RE: Bhaskar's Ontological Grounding of Dialectics



Bakshar's theory sounds remarkable phenomonological to me.  Is this because
I am placing to much emphasis on the observations or just because it is
out of context.  Otherwise, it ould seem that all of the classic critiques
of phenomological analysis are to pooint here.  Namely, that the kind
of phenomonon which are observable constructs a particulary kind of being,
this is the classic phenomo-onto linkage argument. The question becomes,
then what kind of subject is being constructed by this kind of phenomology?
Often it occurs that the subject is decidely monistic, bourgois and 
enlightened seeming.
Wes

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005