Date: Thu, 21 Jul 94 13:36:47 EST From: WCECIL-AT-ucs.indiana.edu Subject: RE: Bhaskar's Ontological Grounding of Dialectics Bakshar's theory sounds remarkable phenomonological to me. Is this because I am placing to much emphasis on the observations or just because it is out of context. Otherwise, it ould seem that all of the classic critiques of phenomological analysis are to pooint here. Namely, that the kind of phenomonon which are observable constructs a particulary kind of being, this is the classic phenomo-onto linkage argument. The question becomes, then what kind of subject is being constructed by this kind of phenomology? Often it occurs that the subject is decidely monistic, bourgois and enlightened seeming. Wes
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005