Date: Mon, 30 Jan 95 06:32:40 GMT From: Chris Burford <cburford-AT-gn.apc.org> Subject: Reality, relativism, and vision Rick Wolff wrote to Ron Press: >>>> I agree with you and with Hegel who wrote repeatedly about the circularity of thought. Escape from the circularity (which is another side of that relativism which frightens so many) entails embrace of an absolute (which frightens me). The issue, wrote Hegel and Marx, is not escape from circularity (a mirage, they thought), but which among the contesting circular systems of thought each of us embraces and acts upon in life.<<<< I keep on getting reminded of some of the stranger passages in section 2 of the Communist Manifesto that look so relativist: >>They do not set up any sectarian principles of their own, by which to shape and mould the proletarian movement... ... The theoretical conclusions of the Communists are in no way based on ideas that have been invented, or discovered, by this or that would be universal reformer. They merely express, in general terms, actual relations springing from an existing class struggle, from a historical movement going on under our very eyes.<<< Can we accept such relativism? Can we accept that the historical movement may not have only one inevitable form and may change? But can we still see the reality of the movement going on under our very eyes? That for me is the riddle and the challenge. Chris Burford Community Psychiatrist, specialising in schizophrenia. Member of the Forum for Marxism, Philosophy and Science, and the Southern Africa Economic Research Unit, SAERU. London "Only connect..." ------------------
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005