Date: Thu, 9 Feb 1995 22:10:58 -0800 From: Tom Condit <tomcondit-AT-igc.apc.org> Subject: Culture, hegemony, et al. Perhaps the dichotomy between the status of writers and that of film makers in Cuba is related to the nature of the media. The highly suspect "Grab Bag" column of L. M. Boyd pointed out recently that film directors, symphony conductors (and, I would add, classical musicians in general) and football quarterbacks take strong exception to the notion that success in the arts or sports is a matter of individual achievement. You can write a novel anywhere. You can only make a film if you have access to a studio, financing, and colleagues who share your perception of what you're doing. Writers tend to be among the most "individualistic" of human beings and don't work well for the most part even in ordinary collaborative situations, let alone under the aegis of a bureaucracy. Cuba, like most of the "socialist" countries, has put a fair amount of support into the film industry and has given the filmmakers a pretty free hand. I suspect there might be ulterior motives related to foreign currency and prestige involved, but let's skip the motives. The fact is, there's a lot of incentive for film makers to stay in Cuba where they have support, as opposed to jumping to another country where they might be subject to just as much red tape and censorship (mostly corporate rather than governmental), without any guarantee of financial support. I think if you look at the whole eastern bloc in recent years you'll see similar stuff. Compare "Ashes and Diamonds" (Poland) or "The Cranes are Flying" (USSR) with Polish or Russian literature of the same period. (I may be out on a limb here, since I'm profoundly ignorant of the latter subject, but you see what I mean.) (I'm also aware of how dated my examples are. "Don't get around much anymore," as the song goes.) Of course, film makers jump ship too. Aleksandr Ford left Poland for Israel, where so far as I can tell he's done nothing of note. (Many would say the same of much of his Polish work, but I like it.) Roman Polanski came to the U.S., where he's done some great stuff and some mediocre stuff. But on the whole, fewer East European film people have come to Hollywood than Germans or French or Italians. The state-supported cultural institutions of "socialist" countries have been accompanied by dreadful censorship and been more often than not turned into propaganda institutions, but for those who work in fields which require buildings, finance and large numbers of (paid) colleagues, the situation in ballet, classical music, "folkloric arts" and cinema has been far better than in this country. Why would anyone except a few superstars want to leave? (I should say that I am fervently in favor of socialist revolutions to overthrow these regimes, in case someone mistakes the tone of the above.) Tom Condit ------------------
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005