Date: Wed, 22 Feb 1995 21:44:27 -0800 From: Tom Condit <tomcondit-AT-igc2.igc.apc.org> Subject: The state This discussion of the state is, of course, intimately linked with the question of "free trade" (of which there really isn't any). The fight against NAFTA, GATT, etc., is related to the defense of what minimal power nation-states (and by extension local and provincial governments) have in making economic policy, since those are the only entities over which ordinary people have any power. To the extent that democratic institutions exist, and to the extent that working people have any power over or influence on them, that power and influence disappear totally in a context in which economic decisions are made by international bodies of capitalist bureaucrats. It's important to realize that the current "free trade" agreements don't really provide for free trade. They allow corporate control, cartelization, etc. If, in fact, the nation-state no longer has any power over economic decisions, then the entire reformist and social democratic project is finished. Social democracy, like stalinism, is above all a nationalist current, projecting reform policies within the context of national economic policy. Without the nation-state, it's worthless. (See Mitterand vs. the Gnomes of Zurich.) The fact the Hillary Wainwright sees this as an invitation to "local power" isn't particularly surprising--it's just a development of the nonsense she spouted in _Beyond the Fringe_, what?, 15 years ago? Tom Condit --- from list marxism-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- ------------------
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005