Date: Sun, 26 Feb 1995 09:37:56 -0500 (EST) From: "JULES D. TUYES" <antjdtx-AT-gsusgi2.gsu.edu> Subject: re: consumerism and freedom, again. First, Nick Mamatas, I appreciate your response to my concerns over media imagery that works against the goals that establish as an activist--fair access to resources, economic justice, and the media appropriation of those causes. I agree, this is no new phenomenon. Post-modernism reminds us that the viewers of television are subjects, not passively receiving these particular manipulative images. Unfortunately, I believe that corporate commercial imagery has reached a new level with claims like, "even in an oppressed society, you can still have fun [the driver drives a hyundhai.], or "freedom to choose [with two blimpie's subs on sale]. I am hesitant to allow the corporate world to appropriate the real work of CITIZENS for these ends. Just keep your eyes open, as a media scholar, I'm sure they already are. As you maintain, the locus of "blame" remains focused on the recipient of the images rather than the producers. How different is this from the use of the "work ethic" to bind wage-slave-laborers to their job, rather than a popular assessment of the more severe injustices associated with corporate ownership. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jules David Tuyes | "You're walking, and you don't | always realize it but you're | always falling. With each step, you | fall forward slightly, and then | catch yourself from falling. | Over and over." antjdtx-AT-gsusgi2.gsu.edu | | --Laurie Anderson ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ --- from list marxism-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- ------------------
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005