Date: Mon, 13 Mar 1995 11:00:33 +0900 From: Guy Yasko <guyy-AT-aqu.bekkoame.or.jp> Subject: Benjamin and Remembering In the context of the recent flap over Mitterand's participation in French fascism, I think it's difficult to claim that Europeans, and the French in particular, have handled the problems of mourning and remembrance any better than others. Without the shroud of silence that covers the subject, I doubt that such a controversy could have risen. The Enola Gay controversy has been truly disgusting, but its structure has not been that different from the Historian's debate in Germany in the 1980s. In either case, national identity has come to face with its horrific past, with conservatives choosing to ignore the past for the sake of preserving national identity, despite the fact that it is the past which makes such an identification impossible. Public debates within the great powers has an international circularity: one nation's citizens point to another's as having done or not done the work of remembering and mourning, and these point to a third nation's debates, and so on. Looking at the US-Japan case, the suffering and death of Asians on the mainland falls out of equations like Pearl Harbor = Hiroshima (which is ridiculous enough in itself; one need not be an Imperial Fascist to question the equivalence between an attack on a military institution on territory that even US politicians considered to be illegally held and the total destruction of a city. And in any case, how does one then explain the destruction of Nagasaki?). I think the same has happened in Europe, where neo-conservatives of all stripes have made the destruction of the Jews a secondary issue. Unlike Jon, I think "Lyotard" is more of a problem than a solution. In his _Heidegger and the "jews"_, (sic) he does his best to obliterate the specificity of the Holocaust by equating it with a number of other horrors. Lyotard transforms the wretched of the earth into what he calls "jews," in a stroke of a pen obliterating the specificity of both the Holocaust and other oppressions. Jews died precisely because they were Jews. There are contexts in which it is possible to make such an equivalence, as say, an expression of solidarity. For example, in response to anti-Semitic attacks on Daniel Cohn-Bendit, French students responded that "we are all German Jews." Obviously, such a response would have been appropriate inside Nazi Germany as well. In the context of the French Heidegger debate however, Lyotard's dubious orthography does not confront a problem with solidarity so much as it retreats from history with dubious generalizations. Since this is a list about Marxism and not a Lyotard list, I'll bring in Benjamin. I have noticed that neo-conservative revisionism has often used Walter Benjamin for it's dubious ends. I'm thinking of the Syberberg (I'm not sure if I've spelled that correctly) film "Our Hitler" in particular. Here Benjamin's "Work of Art..." gets pressed in sevice to mourn not the Jews, but German national identity. Phillipe Lacoue-Labarthe also uses Benjamin's ideas on aesthetics and politics to obscure the issues in his otherwise forgettable _Heidegger, Art, and Politics_. LL finds an aestheticization of politics at the origin of the West which culminates in Auschwitz. LL sounds profound and serious, but he has dissolved the problem; he cannot explain why the West should have culminated at Auschwitz and not somewhere else at some other time. The question here is whether the fault originates in Benjamin or a misuse of Benjamin. I suspect that Benjamin's ambiguity allows the misuse. If one considers that Nazis themselves emphasized the political dimension of art in their exhibition of "degenerate painting" or if one looks at Jesse Helm's career, it seems that Benjamin's formula doesn't really separate fascists from their opponents in any consistent way, hence his popularity among those who would rather obscure the issues. --- from list marxism-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- ------------------
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005