Subject: Re: Gramsci, Laclau, Mouffe (and Bhaskar) Date: Mon, 06 Mar 95 14:46:55 +0000 From: wpc-AT-cs.strath.ac.uk Chodos wrote of L&M What they get right is related to the idea that society is fundamentally an open process (in their terms unsutured). I think that anyone truly committed to purging detrerminism from Marxism has to agree with this. It means, of course, that any notion of "determination in the last instance" has to be abandoned. This is the only possible conclusion from a rejection of determinism, in the sense of not postulating an epochal trajectory of social systems (primitive communism, slavery, feudalism, capitalism, socialism, communism, or some such list). ------------ In what sense do you reject this trajectory? Do you reckon that the earlier transitions never happened, or that the last one is unlikely or that arbitrary reverse transistions may occur - socialism -> feudalism for example. --- from list marxism-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- ------------------
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005