Date: Mon, 3 Apr 1995 10:28:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Louis N Proyect <lnp3-AT-columbia.edu> Subject: Re: Socialist envy > ON SOCIALIST ENVY David Schweickart (d.schweickart-AT-agora.stm.it) > > Modern socialism, particularly Third World socialism, is beset with a > difficult dilemma. On the one hand, socialist movements have been > motivated by an ethical ideal--that of equality. They have been powered by > a deep hatred of inequality, and have aspired to create a more egalitarian > social order. On the other hand, the very passions that have been > mobilized against oppressive inequality shade easily into envy, envy of a > particularly destructive sort. Louis Proyect: This is a most peculiar version of the dynamics of 3rd world socialist revolutions. What motivated the Chinese, Vietnamese, Cubans, Nicaraguans, etc.--as far as I can tell--was not a desire for some kind of abstract "equality". Rather, it was a desire to end the concrete conditions of oppression that motivated them. The Nicaraguan campesino simply wanted an end to Somozista guardia terror, the unclean water that caused needless infant deaths from diarrhea, lack of access to medical facilities and schools, etc. They didn't seek to become "equal" with the plantation-owner; neither did they lapse into "envy" of the rich in Nicaragua. In all the time I spent in Nicaragua, I saw no evidence of leveller fury. I suspect that this is the case in other 3rd world revolutionary societies as well. The true source of resentment in Nicaragua, Cuba, China stems rather from pre-revolutionary elites and newly emerging elites such as the "yummies" in Cuba who were examined by Marc Cooper in an article I posted to this list recently. Their resentment is based on their inability to gain access to consumer goods manufactured in the imperialist nations. They, in turn, fight for elimination of state control of production and distribution in order to open up the possibility of enjoying such privileges as automobiles, designer jeans, etc. The campesino desires a roof over his head, clean water, literacy and medical care. The petty-bourgeois layers, given a choice between satisfying the poor and themselves, will choose themselves. The power of the dollar is awesome. Just to illustrate this phenomenon, I will re-submit for your consideration some of Marc Cooper's report on "market socialism" in Cuba: ------------------------------------------------------------- The rain-forested, open-roofed lobby of the Melia Varadero brought to mind a Hyatt Regency. We wandered through an atrium to the dining room, which overlooked a massive swimming pool complete with its own sandy beach. "If you came here blindfolded and then opened your eyes," Alvaro asked playfully, "would you ever guess you were in Cuba?" We might as well not have been. In a city where even the top tourist hotels offer buffets of suspicious-looking cold cuts and rubbery fried eggs, the fare in Varadero--boiled lobster, grilled swordfish, filet mignon--seemed right out of Malibu, as did Alvaro's lunchtime discourse, which extolled the "flexible" organization that Cuban mixed enterprises are now allowed to have, "freeing us from the slow machinery of our socialist state. One of the biggest problems in Cuban industry," he said, "is that usually it is very hard to fire a worker. There's always the union in between, the Communist Youth, too many layers of protection. But in mixed enterprises, personnel management is more flexible. It's easier to fire workers. In return, the worker gets a salary about 15 percent above the national scale. We also pay for better food for the worker, offer better work, clothes, and in some cases the workers are given a monthly <jabita>, a little bag, full of hard-to-get items like soap and razor blades." As Alvaro explained the rules governing mixed companies in Cuba, it became clear that the big winner was the Cuban state. The government provides workers for each foreign enterprise and charges the employer a monthly salary in dollars. A waiter in a tourist hotel, for example, costs a company about $350 a month, most of which is pocketed by the state. The worker receives, from the state, the base salary of a Cuban waiter: 192 pesos a month, or about $2. "How much do you earn?" I asked Alvaro over dessert. "My salary is 350 pesos a month," he answered. "My employer pays the Cuban state $706 a month for me. And I get the rest." "Less than four dollars a month," I calculated aloud. "How do you buy a Rolex on that pay?" "My foreign employer understands the situation here and takes care of my needs," he said. "You mean he gives you a packet of dollars each month." "Obviously. For the moment, there's no other way." His candor prompted another line of questioning. "I know you support the Cuban government," I said, "but its future is unstable. What do you tell foreign investors who are contemplating coming in to Cuba but are wary of the risks?" "Cuba is the safest place in the world for foreign investment," he answered. "We already made our socialist revolution, defended it for thirty years, and now we're opening up. Your best bet is right here. Because no matter what happens, life will become easier for investors. No one is going to expropriate your factory. Even if our government fails--and I don't think it will--it would mean that socialism has failed. So whatever comes next is not going to be unfriendly to business." The bill for our three-person lunch--chicken, beer, dessert--came to just under $100. Alvaro paid with a crisp C-note. "What everyone wants is to live well," Alvaro said. "One way you can do that nowadays is by working in a mixed enterprise. There are those who criticize us, envy us our success. What do I say to them? Well, we tried to create the New Socialist Man here using moral incentives, the most beautiful idea in the world. But you can't eat ideas. So I'm trying to do what is best for society and for me. Right now that means sell, sell, and sell some more" --- from list marxism-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- ------------------
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005