File spoon-archives/marxism.archive/marxism_1995/95-04-30.000, message 36


Date: Mon, 3 Apr 1995 16:05:09 -0400 (EDT)
From: Louis N Proyect <lnp3-AT-columbia.edu>
Subject: Ron Press's observation


Louis Proyect:

I have shared Ron's consternation but long ago gave up on the idea of 
getting the graduate students and their professors who participate in this 
list to take note of the outside world. 

(This despite the fact that "The Contract on America" may represent a shift 
in class relations unseen in this country over the last 50 years. In the 
March 1995 Harper's Magazine, during a roundtable discussion by Gingrich 
supporters, James Pinkerton, a former adviser to George Bush states, "The 
issue is whether we go further. The issue is how to take apart the 
institutions that are wrecking this country. If we simply pass the Contract on
America, which is essentially a pro-business agenda, and DON'T GO FURTHER (my 
emphasis, LP), then the top half of the economy will be liberated from 
government control and will prosper and the bottom half will continue to stew 
in its Brezhnevian juices. And 2 more years from now we'll have an even more 
radical skew--both electoral and economic--than we did in the 1980's. The moral 
credibility of capitalism will be further undercut..." Now there's food for 
thought for a Marxist. What does this mean for the working-class; what does 
it mean for the left-wing?)

I also tend to agree with the idea that people like Joe Slovo and other 
SACP leaders may possibly have a better grasp of dialectics than all of 
the professional philosophers whose names keep popping up in this list. 
Real evidence of dialectical materialist mastery is seen in one's ability to 
shape political processes and change history. Everything else is mandarin 
hot-air.

On Mon, 3 Apr 1995, Ron Press wrote:

> 1) It sometimes seems very academic. I am personally impressed by
> the depth of reading and philosophical commitment of so many of
> the list contributers. However so many quote people such as
> Bhaskar, T. Smith, and Postone. Are any of them active or have
> been active in the struggle in a practical way ? I noted Sweezy
> was mentioned. I remember his writings as being directed to the
> struggle as it proceeded. Lenin and Marx were of course involved
> personally with the practical side of struggle. Moses Kotane, Joe
> Slovo, Dr. Dadoo. Were not great theoreticians in the ususl sense
> of the word but they developed new paths, new ways of working
> which which resulted in great conrtibutions to the theory of the
> South African struggle.
> 


     --- from list marxism-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---

     ------------------

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005