Date: Wed, 19 Apr 1995 11:29:28 -0800 From: jones/bhandari <djones-AT-uclink.berkeley.edu> Subject: Re: IDENTITY POLITICS AGAIN Don't be so convinced that they are naive (response to Ralph's post below). The absolute suspension of reason from the WHITE LEFT when it comes to analyzing Black leaders and spokespeople leaves African-Americans contained, mystified and sometimes terrorized by them, without any support. Sure, there is criticism of Farrakhan for his anti-semitism. Not enough, but some. Though little criticism of his agenda for ghetto revival: women forced into submission, total rollback of govt assistance, stores based on super-exploitation, and of course mysticism about social life--all the better for enlisting self-exploitation among the people in bow ties we have all had the oppty to meet. The first concentration camps Farrakhan will help build or rather perfect are the ghettos into which minorities, primarily African-Americans, have been forced to live. This is a failure of solidarity right here in the US. And that isolation will only leave African-Americans with little other option than to identify with these Black leaders (the best analysis of these leaders I believe comes from Adolph Reed, Jr). But I don't think white lefties are naive about Black leaders. This way they don't have to deal with African-Americans, forcibly ghettoized, despised by many and now publically humiliated by the whole Murray/Herrnstein fuckery. All the lefties have to do is listen to the opinion of African-Americans as crystallized for them by some total demagogue. Here is a violence of abstraction (or representation) to choke and die on. I stopped listening to the local progressive radio station KPFA because not leaving African-Americans alone, it kept featuring African Liberation Weekend, which sometimes bordered on the insane, e.g. Frances Cress Welsing's analysis of the white fear of genetic annihilation as the basis of modern history. This on the progressive radio station! So low do the demands of rationality drop when it comes to discussion allowed by WHITE LEFTIES on and by the African-American community! White lefties support these leaders, while they privately scoff at the quality of that same leadership, knowing full well that, no matter how radical they sound, they are doing their damndest to prevent another explosion in name of a grand strategy "in our own interest" or of spiritual rehabilitation. Naive radicals? A contradiction in terms, Ralph. What was it James Baldwin said: someone who continues to act innocent, long after that time is gone, becomes demonic. Hey, Marxists, if we are smart enough to know that the economy isn't about allocating scarce resources to maximize that metaphysical entity of utility, most of us can figure out that African-Americans are often contained and suppressed by their leaders and that they must be fought off along with Rush Limbaugh and other grotesqueries, e.g., Bill Clinton. ps will someone please respond to my posts about countertendencies and the new mercantalism? pps I read the first section of Robert Guttmann's book How Credit Money Shapes the Economy. For all you NON-ECONOMISTS out there (like me), this is a wonderful book, a good quick critique of neo-classical economics, a very clear description of the role of money both in bourgeois economics and in reality, and an excellent survey of the crisis we are in. This is only the first section, but it is clear, and accessible to all of us. A real contribution to demystification. >. And Richard Wright warned >his naive white radical friends repeatedly: "Negroes can be >fascists too." > good nite, Rakesh --- from list marxism-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- ------------------
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005