Date: Sun, 14 May 1995 23:34:46 -0400 (EDT) From: glevy-AT-acnet.pratt.edu Subject: Moral depreciation The postings by Rakesh and John Ernst raise some important points. As I see it, the topic of "moral depreciation" has potential relevance for: 1) "the intensification of labor at a late stage of capitalism" (Rakesh's point). I agree with Rakesh's interpretation of the context of moral depreciation in Volume 1 of "Capital." The connection of that idea to Grossman, the contemporary relevance of Grossman's theories, and the issue of how moral depreciation, labor intensity and constant fixed capital relate to each other are all interesting topics that others on the list might want to consider and comment on. 2. John's point that moral depreciation wasn't considered by the Neo-Ricardians or taken into account by Okishio is similarly a very interesting point that some of the Neo-Ricardians on the list might want to consider. Marxist economists also might want to consider (as John suggests) the relation of moral depreciation to technical change, the general rate of profit, and the tendency for the rate of profit to decline. 3. I have suggested that moral depreciation has contemporary relevance for understanding the dynamics of technological change. I assume that all would agree that the question of forced obsolescence of means of production is an important issue for understanding the timing of technical change. Perhaps the issue also has relevance for understanding the trade cycle and the particular forms in which capitalist crises appear and the way in which crises are overcome. Since I know that Mr. Dana will respond to this, I can only repeat my earlier suggestion that we use our time to converse about important issues with which we are concerned rather than responding tit-for-tat with that. For all the mothers on the list: Happy Mother's Day! Jerry Levy --- from list marxism-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- ------------------
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005