Date: Fri, 23 Jun 1995 22:57:10 -0700 From: Tom Condit <tomcondit-AT-igc.apc.org> Subject: Glasnost & democracy Just a brief note on the recent discussion in which the "Glasnost/Perestroika" period in the former U.S.S.R. came up. The important thing to remember about Glasnost is that it was partly a myth. The censorship never really ended, and the debate was restricted as much as possible to one between sections of the "nomenklatura" (literally, I think, "people with titles" or "office holders" in normal American-English usage). I had a chance to talk with Boris Kagarlitsky at a party given for him here in the Bay Area when he was doing a speaking tour, and he told me an anecdote which I think gives a clear picture of the "openness" of "Glasnost": Kagarlitsky had an article accepted by a journal published by the Leningrad Komsomol. The censor held up publication for eight months, then finally permitted it on the condition that one phrase was deleted from every use--"democratic socialism". Kagarlitsky didn't know whether the censor in question was on the side of capitalist "democracy" or stalinist "socialism", but he was clear that the two were incompatible, and that for the nomenklatura it was a choice between them. In this same period, the Gallup Organization did a public opinion poll in the U.S.S.R. People were given four choices as to what type of society they would prefer: "Socialism as we have known it" "Democratic socialism" "A social-democratic welfare state like Sweden" "Capitalism as found in the United States and Britain" I forget, unfortunately, the exact figures for the two first placers in the poll, but "democratic socialism" had a plurality, followed by "a social-democratic welfare state like Sweden", followed by "capitalism as found in the United States and Britain" (17%), followed by "socialism as we have known it" (10%). For those of you slow at addition, that means that 73% of the population wanted either socialism or social democracy, while the question posed to them from above was bureaucratic state planning or Reagan-Thatcherism. (In Ukraine, as I recall, there was a majority for "democratic socialism", but I may be misremembering.) The option which is ever-unacceptable to those at the top is democracy--they "just don't get it". They can't understand it, they know it won't work, they know they have to protect the foolish masses from their own instinctive preference for it. Those familiar with public opinion polls in the United States and how they contrast with the arguments among the elites and their political lickspittles will recognize a certain similarity. Overwhelming majorities in this country want military spending cut, almost no one wants cuts in education and health services. The Democrats and Republicans, of course, argue about how much and how to cut education and health. Tom Condit --- from list marxism-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- ------------------
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005