Date: Wed, 2 Aug 1995 14:34:25 -0400 (EDT) From: Louis N Proyect <lnp3-AT-columbia.edu> Subject: "State Capitalist" Cuba? FACTS ON THE CUBA REVOLUTION I. Gains in Cuban Well-Being after the revolution: Availability of Basic Goods and Services per Capita--Cuba 1958-1978 (1958 = 100) Food & Beverages Clothing Housing Education Health 1958 100 100 100 100 100 1962 99 52 107 173 105 1968 102 52 107 173 105 1972 110 90 103 224 120 1974 120 95 103 275 151 1976 123 100 103 363 175 1978 125 100 104 446 202 (from Claes Brundenius, "Growth With Equity: The Cuban Experience (1959-1980)", World Development Vol. 9, No. 11/12(1981) pp. 1083-96 Comments: 1. Decline in clothing figures can be explained by the fact that a lot of raw material for the textile industry was imported from the US and needed to be replaced by local inputs, a structural transformation that was long and difficult. 2. Lack of growth in housing is because priority for the construction industry was given to building infrastructure, schools and industrial plants. 3. Gains in health took place despite the fact that 1 out of 3 doctors left Cuba in the first 3 years of the revolution. The infant mortality rate in Cuba, up until the recent economic crisis, was one of the lowest in the developing world. 4. The illiteracy rate in Cuba went from 23.6 percent to 3.9 percent in less than one year. This was corroborated by UNESCO and described as a feat unequaled in the history of education. In 1979 compulsory schooling embraced 92 percent of all children between 6-16 years old, and more than 1/3 of the total population was attending some form of school. II. Confronting racism Private Schools in Cuba were abolished in 1961. Before 1961, roughly 15 percent of grade school students and 30 percent of high school students attended private schools which were primarily white. This had led to a 2 tier system in which under-financed public schools were attended by blacks and poorer whites, while the private schools were confined to the privileged elite. This is the state of affairs, of course, that is emerging in the United States. After the abolition of private schools, the bulk of Cuban students started attending fully integrated schools where blacks and whites received equal treatment. The Cuban revolution also attacked racism in housing. It instituted an immediate 50 percent reduction in rent and eventually ownership of the houses was granted to the former tenants. Thus, more blacks as a percentage of the population own their homes in Cuba than in any country in the world according to Lourdes Casal ("The Position of Blacks in Brazilian and Cuba Society", Minority Rights Group Report No. 7, pp. 11-27) III. Gains for Women Getting women out of the home to join men as equal partners in the work-force has been a real challenge to the woman's movement historically. How has the Cuban revolution fared? Before 1953 and 1974, there was a 14.1 percent increase in the number of salaried women in the national work force. Even more significant were the changes in the kind of work women did. In 1953 domestic work represented 25 percent of the total female work force, but by 1970 this occupational category had disappeared. Another change involved the elimination of underage women in the work-force. In 1953, women ten to fourteen years old represented 10.9 percent of the work-force, but by 1970 nearly no women workers could be found in this age category. Finally, certain sectors of industry, which had been traditionally closed to women before the revolution now saw the highest percentage of female employment, including textiles, beverages, tobacco, chemicals, food and graphic arts. So reports Max Azicri in "International Journal of Women's Studies", Vol. 2, No. 1 (1981). IV. Conclusion Behind these stark statistics is the living reality of positive change in the lives of poor Cubans after the revolution. It explains their defeat of the gusano army and their US backers at the Bay of Pigs. It also explains their willingness to put up with the difficulties of life under embargo and economic crisis. This progress was made at the expense of the rich and many middle-class Cubans. The Cuban revolution followed, in other words, the opposite trajectory of the "trickle-down" policies of recent US administrations such as Reagan, Bush and Clinton. Resources in Cuba were diverted from the cities into the impoverished countryside. The Cubans who did not want to make a sacrifice in the name of social justice fled to Miami. Cuba's experiment in socialism may or may not survive the US embargo, the end of Soviet support, or the current economic crisis, which affects not only Cuba but every developing, agriculture-based country. But whatever the eventual fate, the model that has existed will continue to inspire Latin Americas for generations to come. People like Richard Greeman can only exist in the insular world of left-wing sects or academia. He can portray Cuba as "capitalist" while receiving the approving nods of co-thinking sectarians or pedagogues. I defy the good professor to name another "capitalist" country in Latin America that made as much progress as Cuba in as short a time. The reason Washington has been so eager to stamp out revolutionary Cuba is that it knows better than schema-concocting academics where its real class interests lie. I have never seen much reason to glance at "Rethinking Marxism". With rot like yours now featured in it, I see even less reason. --- from list marxism-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- ------------------
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005