Date: Thu, 23 Nov 95 14:54 CST From: Scott Marshall <Scott-AT-rednet.org> Subject: 'State & Revolution' Now here's a good topic for discussion. We are told that this is one of Lenin's worst works, that it is the essence of 'stalinist' (lenin was a pre-mature stalinist I suppose) attack on democracy. Actually I think this one Lenin's clearest and most useful works. It is first and formost an explanation and expose of the true nature of capitalist democracy. It clearly shows how real political, social and economic power are wielded despite any formal trappings of 'democracy.' It clearly asks the key question about democracy: democracy for whom? This is an interesting work to attack, if one believes there is some kind of divide between Marxism and Leninism, or that Kerensky was a Marxist, but Lenin wasn't. In fact this is one of Lenin's most carefully written and planned works. It is clear from even a cursury reading that Lenin spent a good deal of time preparing State and Revolution, by carefully reviewing what Marx and Engels had to say on the question of the state and democracy. In fact the book reads somewhat as a survey of all the major writings of Marx and Engels on these issues. More than that Lenin traces the the development of their ideas on these questions. He catagorically refutes the silly notion, I've seen repeated at times on this list, that Marx and Engels did not put forward the concept of dictatorship of the proletariat. Capitalism hides it's dictatorship of capital behind the quackery of classless 'democracy.' It's really kind of simple, there can be no real democracy in a situation where the economic, political and social commanding heights are held by the capitalist class. You can have voting, you can have parliments, you can have 'opposition', you can have spineless servants of capital like Clinton, Kerensky, and Mitterand who prattle on about democracy. But you can't have working class power and you can't 'win the battle of democracy' unless and until you place the working class in power. Until the working class has political, economic ans social power then you will always have a dictatorship of the minority over the majority, no matter the trappings. Let me hasten to add that Lenin, in State and Revolution, argues vorciferiously for the strongest possible fight of the working class to extend bourgeois (capitalist) democracy as a nessesary part of the revolutionary struggles. The working class needs the greatest possible freedom to pursue the class struggle - legal unions, freedom of assembly etc. Kerensky was a true servant of the capitalists and used force against revolutionary workers. Even ole Anatole F. understood democracy better than Kerensky. Scott --- from list marxism-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- ------------------
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005