Date: Fri, 24 Nov 1995 18:24:41 -0500
From: UticaRose-AT-aol.com
Subject: Re: My purposes in joining this list


In a message dated 95-11-22 05:50:24 EST, Peter Burns writes:

> I am arguing for an anti-
>scientistic interpretation OF Marx,
>not for an anti-scientistic position
>AGAINST Marx.

1) what is "anti-scientistic" ??

2) is it really important whether the interpretation if OF or AGAINST marx ??
perhaps if there were a suspicion that you were some vile anti-marxist that
would have relevance but isnt the salient point whether the interpretation is
correct ?? 

Hal Draper, in about all of his writings, makes what for me is the most
important point about Marx. You need to read Marx and pretty much ignore what
others have said about him for the past 112 years or so.


     --- from list marxism-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---

     ------------------