File spoon-archives/marxism.archive/marxism_1995/95-11-marxism/95-11-30.000, message 86


Date: Tue, 28 Nov 1995 07:18:18 -0500
From: UticaRose-AT-aol.com
Subject: Re: religion


In a message dated 95-11-27 19:06:39 EST, James Miller wrote:

>The problem is that Peter doesn't know
>what he thinks, or if he does, he can't bring himself
>to say it.

But, fortunately, JAMES knows what Peter thinks and, since he does, he can't
stop himself from saying it:

>   His philosophical ramblings are saturated with evasion
>and subterfuge, self-doubt and defensiveness. He cannot
>accept his function as representative of the official
>doctrine of Catholicism, yet he cannot tear himself
>away from what he has come to feel is his home. His
>dilemma is not untypical of the feelings of millions
>of Catholics today

Now that James has unmasked Peter, put him out of his misery with such cant,
can there be anyone with any doubt about the correct way ?

Is there a term for political psycho-babble ?


     --- from list marxism-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---

     ------------------

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005