Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1996 20:18:34 -0500 (EST) From: Justin Schwartz <jschwart-AT-freenet.columbus.oh.us> Subject: Re: Trotsky's prose On Wed, 14 Feb 1996, Scott Marshall wrote: > Justin, > > You'll make a good lawyer - especially when pompousness is called for. Gee, Scott, that's not like you. Perhaps the tone of some of your comrades is starting to influence you. I do think I'll make a good lawyer, though. Who > said 'not exposed' - people have been giving me his stuff since I was > thirteen and briefly around the YSA. I said I tryed to read him and found > him abstract and convoluted. (Granted I have not read much of his narative > stuff but more selections of his theoretical stuff.) Well, try the narrative stuff. It's a wonderful read. Just a flash I haven't > read much of Stalin either and found him wooden and pedantic. Agreed there. I'm glad you > like Trotsky but what is clear to your analytical mind is not nessessary so > for others. By contrast I've always found Lenin and Marx very clear and > understandable except for certain parts of capital. Hm. Lenin, probably. Marx is difficult even when he's being easy and popular. > > Lastly, I don't think what one has read is the best indication of ones > understanding of anything - absent a lot more rounding out it means little - > just check out the 'marxism' being taught in most universities. > Well, I agree that reading isn't the only or best indication. But if you haven't had the personal experience--your present and earlier posts are somewhat contradictory on this--and you don't read the stuff, how can you understand it? Where else are you going to findf out? Watching TV? > Scott > > ps. since you are neither a Trotskyite nor a Trotskyist maybe I should wait > for them to publish the definitive tract on proper nomenclature. I'm a group with a lot of former and some presernt Trotskyists. When I made the mistake early on, the correct nomenclature was hammered home to me quite decisively. Apparantly Trotskyists think that "Trotskyite" is a sTalinist slur, bearing some implication of a cult of T's personality. Personally, I think we should defer to people in what they want to be called unless there is a good reason not to. I don't see one here. Adam, is your understanding that followerrs of TRotsky are called Trotskyists (not "ites")? I don't > recall Trotsky ever declaring, "I am not a Trotskyist." I'm sure he did, though. He thought of himself as a Bolshevik Leninist, not a Trotskyist. He certianly wasn't a follower of himself! --Justin --- from list marxism-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- ------------------
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005