From: LeoCasey-AT-aol.com Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 22:18:05 -0500 Subject: Shining Path Ain't Shinola I have just gotten tired of that ceaseless play "Waiting for the Digest" and signed on for the regular function, with (alas) a blizzard of postings. And it seems like everything is just where it was when the digest collapsed. I tried to catch up on the archives, but they don't go much past what I had seen when the play began. I would like to comment on the complaints to Carlos about his use of the 'shining shit' appellation. I admit that there is something rhetorically repetitive and thus inevitably boring about the way in which Carlos employs the term, but I also think that there is something in the Shining Path which naturally gives birth to the scatological imagery. To wit, I must confess that I wrote and posted the following rejoinder which seems to have gotten lost in the 'digest collapse'. ****************************************************************************** ************************ Louis G. writes: Leo, if there is one thing I have noticed about you, it is your (un)enviable talent of utilizing reductio ad absurdem to ideas you find unpalatable. Your pithy moralizing is particularly offensive; "morals" are not platonic, pre-existing ideas; rather, they emerge out of the struggle between groups and classes. Leo: Some ideas just start out as absurd; you can't reduce the irreducible. Frankly, this Shining Path shit makes me feel a rush of Uncle Lou Proyectese coming on; at times, I am positively Dumainesque when I sit before the keyboard. I just want to say "Take your head out of your ass and clean the shit our of your eyes" when I see these pathetic, mind-numbing rationales for organized political murder. Louis G.: In reading of your "students'" analysis of constitutional issues, my first thought was, "I'm glad you're not my teacher." Leo: Well that makes two of us. Come to think of it, I don't think my students would be very pleased either to find an apologist for organized political murder in their midst either. ****************************************************************************** ************************ Now, Uncle Lou, can you understand why you might be a source of inspiration at these moments? Isn't Carlos' real crime not the use of the scatological, but the lack of rhetorical imagination which afflicts the sectarian, such that a middling line is beaten into the earth with constant use? I mean, he's such a died in the wool Trot that even when you are on the same side of the question, you want to loosen him up a bit. But one thing I know for sure: Shining Path ain't no shinola. --- from list marxism-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- ------------------
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005