Date: Sat, 17 Feb 1996 15:08:53 -0500 (EST) From: Justin Schwartz <jschwart-AT-freenet.columbus.oh.us> Subject: Re: Materialism On Sat, 17 Feb 1996, J Laari wrote: > Justin, > > surely Feuerbach was important. But in that context [Spinoza, Hegel, > Marx & Althusser+Negri+Macherey+Deleuze on Spinoza/Hegel-Marx > relationship] I think I don't have to be ashamed of what I wrote? > Otherwise I agree. I don't understand, but that's all right. I have kept of of this thread because I do not know the references. By the way: what about Marx's dissertation? I don't > know much about that. I have read it, but I'm not qualified to remark on it as a piece of classical scholarship. A friend of mine who is thus qualified (a Marxist classicist-medeivalist) says that it's respectable considering the state of scholarship at the time M wrote and that it was a doctoral dissertation, which in Marx's time was more like a Mater's thesis today. That is to say, if Marx had not written the thing, no one would be interrested in it now. --Justin --- from list marxism-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- ------------------
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005