Date: Sat, 17 Feb 1996 17:33:29 -0700 From: Lisa Rogers <eqwq.lrogers-AT-state.ut.us> Subject: Re: SWP -Reply James Miller wrote: > Recently Lisa Rogers posted a message asserting that > SWP members were required to choose companions or marriage > partners from within the SWP or YS. This is not true. There > are many SWP members who have wives, husbands, companions > or partners who are not in the SWP. I don't claim to have read the manual, but I know what some former members such as Jerry and Louis have said onlist, and in my post I was specifically reporting on what my friends, recently YS members, told me happened to them two weeks ago. The good news is that most of the ex/present members of the YS local are of bi/les/gay/indeterminate/alliance orientation, so apparently the SWP is not presently banning non-straights from membership. If they did, there would be about 1 or 2 members left here. Sorry, no references on 'rules' about this, just observations. Lisa, amateur reporter --- from list marxism-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- ------------------
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005