File spoon-archives/marxism.archive/marxism_1996/96-02-marxism/96-02-18.000, message 76


Date: Mon, 12 Feb 1996 15:19:04 -0500 (EST)
From: Kevin Cabral <kcabral-AT-freenet.columbus.oh.us>
Subject: Re: Buchanan a fascist?


On Sun, 11 Feb 1996, Louis N Proyect wrote:

> Fascism is a counter-revolutionary, violent, extraparliamentary mass 
> movement. Why would the ruling-class exploit fascism unless it could not 
> rely on bourgeois democracy to manage its affairs? When bourgeois 

	The question I have for Louis Proyect, and anyone else involved in
this discussion is one of semantics. In America, what do you mean by
ruling class? Is a union bureaucrat part of the ruling class in your
definition, or is a small business owner, or perhaps the editor of the New
York Times, what about his reporters? How do you approach this semantic
confusion, does your approach differ from Chomsky's?

Kevin
Cols, Oh





     --- from list marxism-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---

     ------------------

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005