Date: Mon, 4 Mar 96 5:43:42 EST
From: boddhisatva <kbevans-AT-panix.com>
Subject: Re: the anxious middle








	
		Ms. Ryan,




	I agree with you about the CPUSA.  When they are clear and topical,
they have a great message that makes logical, "common" sense to people.  It
also helps when they don't end the piece by saying "but, of course after the
massive Communist revolution we won't have to worry about this problem"  


	
	As long as socialists can stick to analysis and not depart into
rhetoric, theory, or talk of the revolution as Messiah, their radicalized
consciousness is an advantage over other groups trying to appeal to the same
disaffected working class.  


	If you look at modern, popular libertarianism, racism, and even
conservatism, you see movements trying to develop all-encompassing
ideologies.  In fact this is the thing about Gingrich that made him so
effective, he was able to distribute those tapes to potential candidates that
gave them a ready response on every issue.  Of course, this is also where
people have found fault with Gingrich, because he, like Buchanan, is hobbled
by the totality if his message.  Pieces sound great, but he insists on trying
to put the thing together and it reveals its crippling flaws.  



	Socialists have a great advantage here because, when pressed, we can
always come out with more of the compendium of Marxist thought.  Any small
issue can be related to another in easy and logical stages.  We need not take
the leaps of faith that our competitors for the hearts and minds of the
working class have to take.  Also, we can always relate the problems of the
day to solutions that rely on positive, practical solidarity, rather than
hate-mongering or moralistic wishful thinking about "the family" and "100
points of light (and other fairy stories)."   







	peace 



	

		boddhisatva







     --- from list marxism-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---

     ------------------