Date: Wed, 6 Mar 1996 01:12:03 -0800
From: djones-AT-uclink.berkeley.edu (rakesh bhandari)
Subject: Re: Buchanan: right-wing populist?


>. First Randy Weaver is a white separatist and not a white
>supremacist. White separatism is a movement that is actually fundamentalist
>Christian in origin. I'm not an expert on the subleties but roughly they
>believe that races should live separately, each with their own kind. 

I'll have to think out the profound implications of this important
distinction.  But....I will say for now that once people identify
themselves as white for the purposes of pursuing an agenda, whether it be
supremacy or separatism or some combination thereof, I think we are dealing
with a movement which is reactionary at its core.  

>The question for us is not the Weaver's racism but were the Weaver's
>fascists? 

Once we recognize the right of "white" people to live in separate
"communities" (what a degradation of the word!) and "peace", then we
sanction all that will be required to clean their environment of all that
filth.  This is not the kind of right  which we should be supporting the
use of arms to defend.  "Ruby Ridge" as a rallying cry does worry me a bit.
     

Really, Ms. Ryan, what are you up to?  And where did the Race Traitor go?  

 What happens, for example,  if Fuhrman doesn't want to move Idaho?  What
if he had wanted the right to  his insane racialized world somewhere in
multiethnic Southern California...

 You know, these Militia idiots really have to grow up and learn how to
live on this earth with the rest of us without their paranoid fantasies
about third world power over the UN and Zionist control of all levels of
government through American Jews and Blacks. 

By the way, next time you are with my comrades-in-arms, tell em' to put a
dijerdoo (?) where it's not comfortable.    

rb

ps after this exchange is over, I have some very interesting bibliographic
information to pass on about Auguste Cornu whom Althusser praised as the
only serious contributor to theoretical French Marxism; also I have been
reading some more very interesting work on the Marx/Schumpeter relationship
and the economics of technical change, disequilibrium and crisis (I truly
believe that Marxism has been impoverished by its inability to integrate
the insights of Schumpeterians such as the American Nathan Rosenberg and
the Brit Christopher Freeman).      

  




     --- from list marxism-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---

     ------------------