From: "Marcus Strom" <MSTROM-AT-nswtf.org.au>
To: marxism-AT-jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU
Date:          Wed, 27 Mar 1996 14:05:25 GMT+10
Subject:       Re: A Modest Proposal


The post below proves my point that the 'maoists' are idealists pure and 
simple.

Their HOLY TENETS are being profaned by the untouchables. We are not 
worthy of the acolytes of the saints. Saint Adolfo is on his holy 
mission to rid the infidels from using jehovahs NAME. The uninitiated 
shall not use HIS name in vain.

This is what it is all about. It is pathetic. It is so idealistic I 
can't believe it. This is why A.O. (Acolytes Only) writes such 
nonsense
:
> Allrigh, put it to the vote and implement the changes, and then we will not
> post or flame such a list while it is called that name.

It is the name that is important to him. That's all. Until this holy 
war is successful, he will keep posting and posting and posting. If 
we ignore him, he will not go away. But if we ignore him, we don't 
read him.

We could call the list the Frank Sinatra list -- and continue our 
debates and discussion on marxism, and Saint Adolfo wouldn't give a 
toss, he would think he had 'won'. If these are the victories they 
are after, they ain't gonna win anything.

We can breath a sigh of relief now and just get on with the list. I 
will post only on mad cow disease, class consciousness and class 
composition, the SLP, et cetera from now on.

Carrol is completely correct on it.

Can someone please teach me how to introduce an automatic delete in 
my e-mail thingy.

PS: Did you hear about the two cows in the field?
One says to the other, "are you worried about this mad cow disease?" 
The othe cow says "Why should I worry? I'm a sheep"

Boom Fucken Boom

> Date:          Wed, 27 Mar 1996 01:07:04 GMT
> To:            marxism-AT-jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU
> From:          hariette-AT-easynet.co.uk (hariette spierings)
> Subject:       Re: A Modest Proposal
> Reply-to:      marxism-AT-jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU

> >Adolfo Olaechea:
> >
> >>What you have is interminable problems with the ABC of Marxism. With its
> >>fundamental premises.  Any honest thinker that has such fundamental
> >>differences with an ideology, can only proclaim it dead and begin his OWN:
> >>Proyectism?
> >>
> >>That could be a good name for your list, and then we would be glad to leave
> >>at to you and your "Academic" friends.  If you cannot agree on a "head" of
> >>your school, why not call it "Rejects of Marxism" or
> >>Once-upon-a-time-Marxists.  Maybe simply Marxism-revisions, will do. If any
> >>such name was adopted - which would be the honest thing to do - then those
> >>who really believe in Marx's ideas will certainly have no time for such a
> >>list and would gladly leave.  We are not against free speech, we are against
> >>DECEPTION!
> >
> >I for one would be happy to agree to such a deal. I'll adopt any and all of
> >the proposals Adolfo has made if he and his sycophants will just go away
> >and bother somebody else, possibly somebody who gives a damn. My own
> >preference is the fake-leftist-revisionist-scum list, though.
> >
> >Rahul
> >
> 
> 
> Allrigh, put it to the vote and implement the changes, and then we will not
> post or flame such a list while it is called that name.  I even grant you
> that you don't have to humiliate yourself that much for us to accept your
> surrender.
> 
> Matbe you could get away with calling the list
> gardens-AT-jefferson.village.virginia.edu
> 
> as Ken Hanley has suggested already. After all it would be an exact
> description of what you want - a bunch of all coddlers debating how to prune
> the roses of Marxism!
> 
> 
> Adolfo
>  
> 
> 
> 
>      --- from list marxism-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
> 


     --- from list marxism-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---