Date: Tue, 2 Jul 1996 19:37:09 +0200 (MET DST)
From: malecki-AT-algonet.se (Robert Malecki)
Subject: Re: Malecki, more time to reading, not replying please!


Adam writes;
>
>In addition, since Trotsky said that there can be no way to throw off the
>Imperialist yolk without socialist revolution, and there has been no socialist
>revolution in Iran, not only was Iran "Hardly a great loss" , there was in
>fact no revolution.

Actually i,m not quite sure about the above. Although it is a soft not sure. 
I wonder actually if the Mullahs in power does not come under a feudal or 
medevil counter revolution..At least for women. Thus if Hillary Clinton led 
a bougeois feminist revolution against the Miulllahs deserving my critical 
support.. 


>eg :                                                   
>                          
>Assume H                Assume H
                      
>	H->A                      H->A
>	A->B                      A->B
>	B->C                      B-<C
>
>	therefore deduce 
>
>	C.                           C.
>
>Reality : C is false.             minus 0 + some feudal priests
>Therefore, H is false.           H is less then the same as A and B for women..
>
                                           malecki




     --- from list marxism-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---