From: Luis Quispe <lquispe-AT-blythe.org> Subject: Re: Summary on FBI Bastard (MIM). Date: Mon, 19 Aug 1996 21:04:58 -0400 (EDT) COUNTER-ATTACK AND DEFEAT ALL REACTIONARY LIES! "Maoist international Movement" (MIM): A ZINOVIEV SECT OF SUSPECT ORIGIN (FBI) AT THE SERVICE OF COUNTER-REVOLUTION. Background: MIM Notes No. 39, January 1990. "RCP Moves closer to MIM line.": "With the publication of the RCP Comment in A World To Win (November 1988), there is little doubt now that the RCP has moved closer to the MIM line in many ways...MIM applauds this progression in the RCP's line...In conclusion, MIM salutes the developments within the RCP, particularly in the relationship to the RIM in the November 1988 issue of A World To Win and the special issue on Mao...The RIM still has had nothing to say to MIM, despite the draft of our open letter (now official) to them..." MIM Notes No.95, p. 9, December 1994 "People's War, not capitulation, in Peru". MIM states: "If Comrade Gonzalo was telling the people to lay down their arms, then how come Fujimori doesn't let Gonzalo speak to the whole people, openly and with witnesses as to his health? Seeing this, the majority of the revolutionary Communist Party of Peru (PCP) opposed entering peace negotiations at all." Maoist Sojourner, January 1995, p.2, MIM states: "It appears that Comrade Gonzalo has indeed called on the Peruvian Government for peace negotiations. There is nothing wrong with that." MIM Notes 111. April 1996, p. 10: "MIM discontinues Peru work for now." In the same issue MIM falsified a statement of the PCP: "Comrade Gonzalo, the leader of the Peruvian revolution, signed a document with the RCP-USA and named the RCP-USA as the `principal leader' of the RIM." MIM Notes No. 116, June 15, 1996, p. 1. "The Peruvian comrade abroad [Don Adolfo] asked MIM to cease our work supporting the Peruvian revolution has retracted his request." As far as we know, no person associated with the PCP has requested MIM's support, but opportunistic MIM invents this story to jump into Luis Arce Borja's ghost organization "World Mobilization Commission" in which no PCP generated organizations participate. It is necessary for all honest revolutionaries and progressives to lead the masses and counter-attack this reactionary slander against the People's War and the World Proletarian Revolution. MIM, a tiny gang that claims to be supportive of Maoism, gives the impression of supporting the People's War, but in reality has never offered sincere support. MIM's "support" has been distorted in favor of opportunist and counter-revolutionary views. MIM distorts the political character of revolutionary developments, and it expresses self-serving positions through false characterizations. MIM slanders many modest and sincere supporters who struggle to give their work, their food, and their daily efforts to the People's War. MIM calls them "ultraleftists" and "cops" in a futile attempt to discredit them. Such misrepresentation is a clear attack against the PCP, the People's War in Peru, and the World Proletarian Revolution. MIM continuously presents the RCP-USA (RCP) as revisionist clique, and even put up a phony "competition" against the RCP to deceive people, but at the same time it follows the misconceptions formulated by the RCP. It pretends to criticize the Revolutionary Internationalist Movement (RIM), but for years has sought vainly to participate, in that organization, which has always considered MIM a "suspect entity." MIM simply reformulates the position published weekly by RCP since 1993 in its paper "Revolutionary Worker" which says: "Fujimori has repeatedly claimed that Chairman Gonzalo has made a call for negotiations from prison. In this situation, what possible excuse can Fujimori now offer for continuing to deny Comrade Gonzalo an independent contact...? It is vitally important for people in Peru and around the world, to hear what Chairman Gonzalo's views are from Chairman Gonzalo himself, -directly and unimpeded." After 16 years of victorious People's War, during the strategic equilibrium stage in preparation for the strategic counter-offensive, MIM and RCP suppress or ignores the views of the main architect of the People's War, President Gonzalo, especially his historic speech from the cage of September 1992 which in synthesis, called for the people and the Party to overcome the "bend in the road," developing further the People's War and continuing the armed struggle to Conquer Power countrywide, serving the interests of the proletariat and the masses of poor and oppressed people. Through subterfuge, MIM and RCP refused to denounce and reject the reactionary "peace accord" for what it is: a sinister imperialist attack against President Gonzalo, the PCP, the People's War in Peru, and the World Proletarian Revolution. While the RCP creates the false impression that it is unknown if President Gonzalo wants to continue the armed struggle, MIM agrees with the CIA's and Fujimori's plot, emphatically stating that President Gonzalo is calling for peace talks. The RCP portrays the Fujimori-CIA farce of "peace talks" as "a line inside the PCP" when everybody knows that Fujimori is NOT a member of the Communist Party of Peru (PCP.) Both positions are counter-revolutionary. MIM and RCP positions imply: "So he surrenders, now let us see him, and now there is no excuse to keep him in isolation; respect human rights" and they use the cover of "Defend the life of Doctor Guzman... in this situation." However, it is clear to all Maoists and sincere supporters of the People's War, that THE MASSES MAKE HISTORY, and that President Gonzalo would never claim that his life is more important than the revolution. MIM upholds the reactionary position that "leaders make history." They focus on individuals, and use this position to suppress the masses, to attack the PCP Central Committee leading the masses to the conquest of Power in People's War, the People's Front for Liberation (FPL), the People's Committees of Workers and Peasants, the victories of the heroic People's Army of Liberation (EPL), and the STRATEGIC EQUILIBRIUM in preparation of the counter-offensive. MIM claims that "the majority" of the PCP takes an anti-peace position because of President Gonzalo's isolation, and that his continuing isolation proves that Fujimori is lying. MIM forgets that reactionaries all over the world have been deceiving the masses for years, and the "video" and "peace letters" are simply components of low intensity warfare, prepared by the intelligence services aided by a handful of capitulators and revisionists who were purged from the ranks of the Party. Since MIM was not able to establish a serious organic relationship with the MPP abroad, it turned for information on the People's War to eccentric sources outside the Party such as the London Charlatan, Adolfo Olaechea. Therefore, MIM is not a Maoist critic nor a supporter of the Peoples War but an apprentice of senderology. MIM claims that there are two lines within the International Communist Movement in support of the People's War in Peru, "the Right Opportunist Line" and "The Ultraleft," MIM explains: "The prestige of the great Peruvian revolutionaries paid for with the blood of the Peruvian people went into backing revisionism in the imperialist countries. Peruvian exiles sickened by this could not help but wish to upgrade their relations with genuine Maoist organizations like MIM. They did not wish to let revisionists attract new revolutionary forces to their banner, by using the prestige of the Peruvian revolution." MIM Sojourner, January 1995. This self-serving statement published by MIM was accompanied by a proposal to the MPP that: "In exchange for MIM's support and denunciation of Fujimori's hoax for peace talks, the PCP should consider MIM, the vanguard Party within the US borders." MIM's request clearly has nothing in common with Maoism! The prestige of the PCP cannot be transferred onto this or any other group as if it were a commodity traded in the market place. It is always the duty of authentic revolutionaries to struggle against revisionism and capitulation in every country by applying Marxism-Leninism-Maoism, principally Maoism; it means revolutionary struggle in theory and practice, not cheap pleas for "endorsement!" MIM even claims, without further explanation, to have advanced its ideology from Marxism-Leninism-Mao Zedong Thought into Marxism-Leninism-Maoism (MLM). However, this miraculous transformation occurred only on paper (in MIM Notes!) The fact is that MIM's ideology upholds metaphysical and idealist views dressed up with pseudo-radical bourgeois ideology. MlM's ideology is not Maoist at all. MIM mentions that both right opportunists and ultraleftists work, in their own way, to support the revolution in Peru. This is not true. The capitulators were purged by the People's War and the "peace hoax" is no more than a scheme made up of a handful of hired mercenaries and CIA agents operating from outside the PCP (NOT INSIDE the PCP as the RCP-USA claims.) The capitulators (right opportunists according to SIN and MIM) are AGAINST the People's War in Peru; but MIM COVERS THIS FARCE, presenting such hired mercenaries as "supporters of the revolution." MlM's bourgeois deceptions do not end there. For MIM, the PCP Central Committee is ultraleft! This is how MIM presents it: "Further complicating matters in the International Communist Movement is an ultraleft line, nicely complementing right opportunism. According to the ultraleft, armed struggle is always the immediate task at hand, even in the imperialist countries. These ultraleftists give no heed to Maoist science, no matter how many times it proves itself valid. In connection with the situation in Peru, the ultraleft tried to sow confusion and attempted to stab the legacy of Lenin, Stalin, and Mao in the back by acting as if these leaders did not enter into negotiations with reactionaries of all sorts -imperialists, comprador, bureaucrat capitalists and right-wing national bourgeoisie. These elements, though secondary to the right opportunist elements, implied that Comrade Gonzalo would be automatically wrong to enter into peace negotiations. They attempted to restrict Gonzalo's freedom of action and sought to undermine his leadership from abroad by going further in attacking more than necessary the peace negotiations. Instead of simply opposing the laying down of arms, the ultraleft attacked Lenin, Stalin, Mao and Gonzalo for engaging in or supposedly engaging in peace negotiations. Comrades who put forward this line should criticize publicly the idea that peace negotiations are always bad, or that they prove their infidelity to the principles of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism." (emphasis added.) There is no connection between the people who support the armed struggle in Peru and those "ultraleftists" that MIM refers to so much. MIM fabricates a crazy story in which "to the ultraleft, armed struggle is always the immediate task at hand, even in the imperialist countries." MIM should clarify the origin of these fantasies, because it is a clear falsification, and an attack against Marxism-Leninism-Maoism, Gonzalo Thought. It is a vulgarization of the Peruvian revolution. Marxism-Leninism-Maoism, Gonzalo Thought clearly considers the People's War as the principal form of struggle in the strategic offensive of the World Proletarian Revolution. The People's War in every country will develop unevenly, at diverse locations and at various times, depending on the revolutionary situation, the Communist Parties and their guiding ideology. Revolutionary actions must aim at supporting, preparing, and developing the People's War in every country, considering concrete national and international conditions, considering that revolutionary violence is the essence of Marxism, and that "political power grows out of the barrel of a gun." It is not true that those who support the People's War -and the PCP- consider "armed struggle as the immediate task at hand". Only adventurists and "focoists" act in this way, neglecting objective conditions. MIM openly attacks Lenin, Stalin, Mao and President Gonzalo, but it does so under the subterfuge of defending them against an "ultraleft" that can only exist in the heads of the individuals in MIM. MIM lies when it writes: "The ultraleft tried to sow confusion and attempted to stab the legacy of Lenin, Stalin and Mao in the back by acting as if these great leaders did not enter into negotiations with reactionaries of all sorts...". MIM could well write that "Lenin, Stalin and Mao negotiated the revolution with reactionaries of all sorts", in other words, they betrayed the revolution. This is an absolute lie, this is plain Trotskyism. MIM then covers up its Trotskyism by defending the "legacy" of "these great leaders." But MIM presents negotiations with reactionaries of all sorts as the "legacy" to defend. This is a reactionary position; an attempt to deceive the masses and spread the seeds of capitulation. MIM goes further. It distorts President Gonzalo's positions and attacks him: "These elements (the "ultraleft") implied that Comrade Gonzalo would be automatically wrong to enter into peace negotiations." Here's the role of MIM at the service of the intelligence services. A "Maoist caricature" of Cointelpro. MIM, ignoring actual objective conditions, suggests that it is incorrect to completely reject the farce prepared and applied by the CIA, through its puppet Fujimori government. Then MIM accuses the "ultraleft" of an "attempt to restrict Gonzalo's freedom of action and seeks to undermine his leadership >from abroad by going further in attacking more than necessary the peace negotiations." According to MIM, to expose, reject, and counter-attack such a reactionary farce "restricts Gonzalo's freedom of action and undermines its leadership". BUT WHAT FREEDOM OF ACTION? It is clear to the whole world that President Gonzalo is below ground in complete isolation, and in a cage in prison, suffering continuous torture. This is the same argument advanced by mercenaries and CIA agents, to make believe that President Gonzalo requested a "peace accord" on his own "free initiative." In addition, MIM states that the leadership of President Gonzalo was undermined because of the successful campaign in Peru and abroad, against the imperialist "peace negotiation" farce; and that such an "anti-peace" was "more than necessary." MIM desperately tries to defame as "traitors" and "cops" those who support the People's War, "traitors," because the counter-revolutionary "peace accord" campaign MIM supported is defeated, and "cops," because we have exposed MIM and its "Sojourners" as counterrevolutionary agents. MIM objects to the revolutionary advance in the United States through the work of many groups with the MPP. MIM is taking the side of the counter-revolution. MIM speaks the same words of the reactionaries, and it openly promotes "peace negotiation." This is MIM, a pseudo "Maoist" Organization, a likely creature of the Yankee intelligence services now seeking to jump into a "world mobilization commission" to legitimize itself and seeking to split the Communist movement in support of the People's War. This is not the revisionist CPUSA of Gus Hall. This is not a Trotskyst Party SWP, and this is not the Republican Party. It is MIM! MIM slanders and attacks honest supporters of the armed struggle in Peru. What is the ultraleft? When? How? and Where? MIM does not back up with facts any of its illusions and allegations. There is no such "ultraleft" within our ranks. If there is a cop, surely it must be inside MIM. MIM's slanders against the PCP are plain lies. On the other hand, MIM's political record is clear: 1) MIM supports capitulation and the CIA's peace hoax, 2) once we defeated the capitulators abroad, MIM announced its "suspension of support for the People's War," 3) once we unmasked MIM's counterrevolutionary positions, MIM now jumped into Arce Borja's "World Mobilization Commission." Truly opportunist and reactionary political behavior. Above all, people who support the revolution in Peru are conscious of the fact that after 16 years of victorious People's War, at present in strategic equilibrium and preparing the strategic counter-offensive, with a system of Base Areas; with a heroic PCP leading the victorious People's Army and People's Front, and with increasingly bold international support, it would be treason to negotiate a "peace accord" now for the benefit of imperialism. It is obvious that the People's War is advancing towards the Conquest of Power in the whole country, and the only ones who want to stop it are the imperialists and reactionaries in Peru and all over the world. For the PCP, there is no reason to "negotiate peace." On the contrary, there is every reason for the PCP to lead the armed struggle to complete the new democratic revolution, and continue with the Socialist Revolution and Cultural Revolutions, to reach Communism in Peru and the whole world. These are the tasks, considering concrete conditions and the situation as a whole. Working people! Supporters! Comrades! Consider concrete conditions and the situation as a whole, and remember what our respected President Mao Tse-Tung clearly expressed: "To fight is to survive, to make peace is to perish." LONG LIVE PRESIDENT GONZALO AND HIS POWERFUL THOUGHT! LONG LIVE THE COMMUNIST PARTY OF PERU! LONG LIVE THE 16th ANNIVERSARY OF THE PEOPLE'S WAR! LONG LIVE PROLETARIAN INTERNATIONALISM! LONG LIVE MAOISM, DOWN WITH REVISIONISM AND IMPERIALISM! May 1996. Peru People's Movement (MPP.) --- from list marxism-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005