File spoon-archives/marxism.archive/marxism_1996/96-08-marxism/96-08-21.140, message 48


Date: Tue, 20 Aug 1996 12:47:15 -0400 (EDT)
From: Louis N Proyect <lnp3-AT-columbia.edu>
Subject: Re: == No Subject ==              


This looks like an extraordinarily valuable contribution. Could you
summarize the high points for the list? I plan to read the whole thing
carefully but others might want to skim.

Louis


On Tue, 20 Aug 1996, Ian Nicol wrote:

> Re:OP Broadsheet 5 Part 1
> Advance from Vanguardism
> 
> Organise Communist Rapprochement
> 
> 
> When it was established in 1990, the Editorial Board of Open Polemic 
> unequivocally adopted what it understood to be the scientific ideology of 
> Marxism-Leninism, in the recognition that the communist movement as a 
> whole and not just particular segments of it, was in a deepening state of 
> ideological confusion and theoretical disorder. If the revolutionary 
> movement was to advance, the resolving of demarcations across and within 
> the various segments, leading to the eventual integration of the 
> movement, was essential and this demanded the development of an open 
> polemic between communists at the highest possible, theoretical level.
> 



     --- from list marxism-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---


   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005