Date: Fri, 23 Aug 1996 16:17:32 -0500 From: dhenwood-AT-panix.com (Doug Henwood) Subject: Re: Henwood comes up with another myth of the white proletariat At 3:31 PM 8/23/96, Maoist Internationalist Movement wrote: >Production is not the result of white labor efforts or >productivity in the imperialist countries. Are Japanese white? Are striking black pressworkers in Detroit white? There is no question that imperialism has immiserated the so-called Third World. If 20% of production is appropriated by imperial interests, it's impossible to grow. But it's insufficient to explain more than part of OECD wealth; accepting Amin's numbers, the Third World transfer boosts first world investment (i.e. accumulation) by 19% - less than one in five money units. "White labor efforts" don't just consist of coupon-clipping. The overwhelming portion of what any Marxist would call value-production - the engagement of living labor for profit - takes part in the rich countries and under their control. Third Worlders are increasingly involved in the direct production of profit for capital through increasing industrialization - witness the homeland of your namesake - but the bulk of transnational capital is sited in OECD countries. I'm not sure what you advocate really? Should the social and physical capital of the first world be liquidated in an act of violent repentance? Marx thought that bourgeois life had something to recommend it, didn't he? What is your model for your transformed world? It seems rich with a scary primitivism. Doug -- Doug Henwood Left Business Observer 250 W 85 St New York NY 10024-3217 USA +1-212-874-4020 voice +1-212-874-3137 fax email: <dhenwood-AT-panix.com> web: <http://www.panix.com/~dhenwood/LBO_home.html> --- from list marxism-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005