Date: Mon, 26 Aug 1996 12:20:20 -0400 (EDT) From: louisgodena-AT-ids.net (Louis R Godena) Subject: Re: Marxism and Religion: the reality is more complex in the international arena. Mr Wei En Lin first finds a saving grace in an earlier age of religious activism: > ...The revolutionary upheaval in China's history (prior to 1911) was intimately >associated with an unorthodox form of Christianity propounded by Hong. Throwing caution to wind, Mr Wei then goes on to say such and such. And such and such is not true. Like so many others on the Marxism list, he thinks it sufficient merely to assert. For example, he links on the flimsiest of pretexts the fiercely nationalist (and quite revanchest) Sarvodaya movement in Sri Lanka with the ill-starred Maoist revolutions of the 1970s. Aside from locale and a very few secondary personalities, the two struggles are innocent of each other. No matter. Mr Wei merely echoes his earlier invocation of Taoism as the "basis" for Chinese "revolutionary" movements. Some have seen in, say, the development of Mao's thinking a manifestation of traditional Taoist dialectics (*yin and yang*), while others have with equal certainty discerned in these same properties the influence of Stalin. What of it? One could point to the Protestant noncomformist background, embedded in the American and British trade union traditions, which at once gave them its missionary zeal and fervor and, at the same time, accommodated a respect for liberal society and the rule of law; the prospect for winning concessions for the workers within those societies mitigated its revolutionary prospects. Does this mean that contemporary Protestantism, from William Sloane Coffin to Jimmy Swaggert, is inordinately "progressive" or the natural ally of Marxism? To ask the question is to answer it. Mr Wei may be nostalgic for an earlier period of history when certain theological currents--like much of capitalism itself--bore a "progressive" flavor. That time is now long past. Religion, as well as the capitalist system which it serves, is in an advanced stage of putrefication and decay. This process is inexorable, all efforts on the part of people like our heroic Mr Wei to the contrary. To view historical development as ambiguous and problemmatic is common among Marxists, even while retaining our "faith" in the continued forward progress of the revolution (akin, given our modern woes, to a "miracle" perhaps?). Let us not succumb, in our current travails, to the alluring but stultifying superstitions of an earlier age The final and deciding point is that the class content of religious thought--and this includes secularist outfits like "Liberation" theologists--cannot in the modern age be compatible with the long term goals of revolutionary Marxism. And Mr Wei, for all his historicist contortions, knows it. --- from list marxism-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005