Date: Thu, 29 Aug 1996 21:49:01 -0400 From: Vladimir Bilenkin <"achekhov-AT-unity.ncsu.edu"-AT-ncsu.edu> Subject: RE: Labor & Racism: Construction Trades >An important task of Marxists and progressives in the labor movement is to >squarely face this phenomenon--which has its echo throughout much of the >labor movement. There is much truth, unfortunately, to the >charge--leveled by MIM, Rakesh, and others, that the labor movement in >America is, indeed, permeated with the privileges and the perogatives of a >"labor aristocracy", acting hand in hand with the employers and against the >interests of the world's (largely impoverished) workers. >The question is: where do we go from here? >Louis Godena To recognize this ugly fact is already a big step forward. But isn't this section of American workers constitutes a minority of US labor force? The very viciousness of their efforts to protect their turf seems to suggest how insecure they feel in the midst of the laboring masses who become more impoverished and more willing to challenge their privileges. IMO, to portray these workers as representing the US proletariat as a whole towering above the billions of exploited toilers of the rest of the world may be very dangerous for both sides. This would only play in the hands of metropolitan and national bourgeoisies. Instead, the privilidged layers of the working class in the North should be politically neutralized wherever their cooperation with the rest of the workers is presently out of question. The problem is how to mobilize the masses without antagonizing the "aristocracy" and pushing it into the hands of reaction. Vladimir dangerous --- from list marxism-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005