Date: Fri, 30 Aug 1996 02:02:34 -0800 From: djones-AT-uclink.berkeley.edu (rakesh bhandari) Subject: RE: Labor & Racism: Construction Trades >>>An important task of Marxists and progressives in the labor movement is to >>>squarely face this phenomenon--which has its echo throughout much of the >>>labor movement. There is much truth, unfortunately, to the >>>charge--leveled by MIM, Rakesh, and others, that the labor movement in >>>America is, indeed, permeated with the privileges and the perogatives of a >>>"labor aristocracy", acting hand in hand with the employers and against the >>>interests of the world's (largely impoverished) workers. Louis (G) has raised raised important questions about the political impact of a labor aristocracy, croneyism and racist practices in the US labor movement and, perhaps most importantly, about the struggle of real industrial unionism against the exclusivist practices of craft unions. However, I would like to again emphasize my differences with MIM and all those who would put maximum emphasis on struggle against the labor aristocracy or simply whites. I think a greater problem is actually the class consciousness of the multiethnic proletariat; this seems to me more a problem than a corrupt or parasatic labor aristocracy or even white racism. In my maze of footnotes, I have already made reference to some findings by Vincente Navarro; he provides a powerful analysis of how government statistical production has contributed to muting class consciousness in this country, while abetting race consciousness: "In the 1986 data, the mortality rate of heart disease was 2.3 times higher for blue-collar workers than for managers and professionals. This class differential is much greater than white/black mortality differential: the heart disease mortality rate was 1.2 times greater for black males than for white males and 1.5 times greater for black females than for white females. And the class mortality differentials between, say, blue-collar or service workers and corporate lawyers increased during the 1980s--even more than did the race differentials. "The key point here is that the growing class mortality differentials, which are ignored by the government and the media, are primarily responsible for the growing race mortality differentials, not the other way around. This is because the overwhelming majority of blacks (and other minorities) belon g to the low-paid sectors of the working class." *Dangerous to your health: Capitalism in Health Care* Monthly Review, 1993:107-8 Once we truly identify with our class-- especially the vast majority who historically has only been able to rely, in lieu special skills and priviliges, only on its own direct action and solidarity for their own defense-- we will soon discover that not only does this class sustain the whole edifice through its labor, no matter how much bourgeois ideology denies this as well, it also endures the system's greatest degradations and horrors. It is not an accident that this class has often been comprised of rightless migrant workers and racialized throughout American history and discriminated against. Rakesh --- from list marxism-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005