Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 07:51:23 +0100 From: hariette-AT-easynet.co.uk (hariette spierings) Subject: Re: Jesus , Engels and Herr Karl Duhring >Adolfo, defending dialectical materialism against Karl C's charges of >idealism and religion with some good quotes, finishes off by dragging Mao >into the arena: > >>And trying to set Marx against Engels, or Lenin, or Mao on this account will >>not work either: >> >>"The material, sensously perceptible world to which we ourselves belong IS >>THE ONLY REALITY...... Our consciousness and thinking, however >>supra-sensous they may seem, are the product OF A MATERIAL, bodily organ, >>the brain. Matter is not a product of mind, but mind itself is merely the >>highest product of nature" - Frederic Engels (Karl Marx, Selected Works, >>Eng. ed., Vol I pp 430-31). >> >>And Karl Marx himself: >>"It is impossible to separate thought from matter that thinks" (Ibid, p. 435). >> >>And Lenin: >> >>"Materialism in general recognises OBJECTIVELY REAL BEING (MATTER) as >>independent of consciousness, sensation, experience...... Consciousness is >>only the reflection of being, at best, an approximately true (adequate, >>ideally exact) reflection of it". (Lenin, Selected Works, Eng ed., Vol XI, >>p. 377). > >Why mention Mao when you only quote the other three? > >Why leave out Trotsky? His last great battle before Stalinism ice-picked >him was a no-holds-barred struggle against philosophically unprincipled >petty-bourgeois sceptics over the two fundamental questions of a) the >character of the Soviet Union and b) dialectical materialism as the basis >of revolutionary Marxist thought and action. This struggle is documented in >In Defence of Marxism, 1940. > >Cheers, > >Hugh > >PS Is your failure to mention Stalin or Guzman significant? > NO. All the Marxist Classics are militant materialists, and Chairman Gonzalo is for us the greatest Marxist-Leninist-Maoist leader of today, a true and consistent revolutionary. However, not all militant materialists are per force consistent Marxists though. Trotsky - on the question of religion - was a militant materialist too as so many others can be. You, Hugh Rodwell, whatever your protestations - and there is the record of this debate to prove it - have shown a clear penchant, in practice, to be on the fence on this issue seeking all sorts of specious arguments to coddle up to religion. I think you have made it clear - perhaps involuntarily - that for you, Trotsky, and the cult you practice of his personality in which you are the most persistent high priest in this list - having practically nothing else to say or do - is a form of religion to be used as opium for your own empty eunuch's dream of a revolutionary leadership role which never was and will never be. Adolfo --- from list marxism-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005