Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 09:48:39 -0600 From: Hans Ehrbar <ehrbar-AT-marx.econ.utah.edu> Subject: Jesus, Engels and the fact-value distinction I apologize for butting into this discussion at this late stage. There is one theme which was present in some of the earlier contributions to the religion thread, which I could no longer discern recently. I would like to formulate this theme in the following theses: (1) The fact-value distinction which we all are taught is a prerequisite of science is wrong, wrong, wrong! Value is not always merely something which we carry to the world from the outside, but the world itself is value-laden. (2) Marx got it wrong too. He saw morality only as an instrument of oppression (which it usually is) but did not explicitly acknowledge the true kernel of it, i.e., the values embedded in the world. (3) People sense that science, in its modern incarnation, is lacking something and turn to religion to find what is lacking. There is a secret complicity between the value-less shallow realism of science and the irrealist values promoted by religion. (4) In addition to criticizing religion for its irrealism we must therefore also criticize science for its failure to see that values are objective and real. This is not something I figured out by myself but I learned it from reading Bhaskar. Hans E. --- from list marxism-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005