From: "Rosser Jr, John Barkley" <rosserjb-AT-jmu.edu> Subject: how to moderate a list without purging Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 15:05:21 -0400 () I tried to send this before got a message that it did not compute. We have a horrendous new system which cannot handle volume or much else, and I have been off M1 mostly lately, although lurking on the duck pond. I don't know what the spoons have decided about beating up on the knives and forks, but I have a proposal about how to moderate a list without purging the lovable Planet Gonzo's inhabitants (and who among us does not belong there? Surely not the officious Louis Proyect!). Ecol-econ had an unmoderated list that got wrecked by a single person who simply sent too much, although to this day he refuses to admit this. They now limit an individual to having their last eight messages not exceed 12% of the total of the last 100 messages to the list. This allows people to send several messages in one day, which might be useful if they are involved in a hot thread. But then they would have to cool it for awhile. Also ecol-econ's managers warn people when they are about to crash into their limits. This should help the volume problem. I think that efforts to purge based on Louis's or Lisa's or Hans's judgment of the intellectual, political, literary, moral, or psychiatric content of their messages is doomed to failure and duckpondery. I have nothing against new lists, but in general think that the new "let a thousand lists bloom" proposal is just an invitation to balkanization and the end of dialogue. An ecol-econ type moderation would make things more manageable, if not necessarily more sane. Barkley Rosser PS: Since I have been mostly off of here recently, I apologize for not getting back at anybody who may have called me a fascist, social democratic rubbish, or petit bourgeois revisionist scum in my absence....:-). -- Rosser Jr, John Barkley rosserjb-AT-jmu.edu --- from list marxism-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005