Date: Fri, 05 Apr 1996 09:05:16 -0600
From: Lisa Rogers <eqwq.lrogers-AT-state.ut.us>
Subject:  Re: separate M1 and M2 -Reply


The insistence upon rehashing old crap is a form of harrassment, IMO.
"Cross-fertilization" is _not_ essential.  What Hugh _seems_ to care
about is what he's posting about, which is REHASH of old crap.  This
list was not created for that.  It was also not created for pains in
the ass, or discussion of the definition thereof.  Don't we know it
when we see one?  Speaking of which, is Hugh a "material social
force" ?  Does it matter?

If I could have a couple of seconds on this motion, or something like
that, should we zap people who engage in such *anti-discussion* and
get it over with, or what?

Do we have to have lengthy hearings, or shall I serve the "will of
the list" without any fanfare?  Which way will I get shot at more? 
Any volunteers for this "job"?  

[No, I'm not really bailing out.]

The list really doesn't want any more stuff like this post either,
I'm betting.  So give me the go-ahead or . . . we're stuck with this
shit in the name of "democracy" ???

Lisa

>>> Hugh Rodwell <m-14970-AT-mailbox.swipnet.se>  4/5/96, 09:35am >>>
Leo, define this 'evil culture' and the way it prevented free and
open discussion on m1. 
[snip]
Cross-fertilization is essential, putting closed circle rules in the
way of this cross-fertilization is counter-productive.
[snip]
So what material social forces are driving our discussions on Marxism
into such mutually repellent camps?
[snip]



     --- from list marxism2-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---