Date: Fri, 5 Apr 1996 23:27:01 -0500
Subject: Re: separate M1 and M2, i.e. no cross-posting


--- Forwarded mail from Fork Collective <forks-AT-jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU>

>From spoons  Fri Apr  5 22:20:37 1996
Received: (from forks-AT-localhost) by jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU (8.7.1/8.6.6) id WAA72379; Fri, 5 Apr 1996 22:20:36 -0500
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 1996 22:20:36 -0500 (EST)
From: Fork Collective <forks-AT-jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU>
To: marxism2-AT-jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU
Subject: Re: separate M1 and M2, i.e. no cross-posting
In-Reply-To: <v01540b01ad8aa3a05fb3-AT-[130.244.107.6]>
Message-ID: <Pine.A32.3.91.960405220523.47429B-100000-AT-jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU>



On Fri, 5 Apr 1996, Hugh Rodwell wrote:
> Will an explicitly critical attitude to the artificial distinctions being
> instituted with respect to the discussion of Marxism lead to exclusion?

It has already been decided that M2 is a separate list.  Criticis of that 
rule does not belong on this list.
> 
> d) Will a desire to pursue a discussion relevant to M1 and M2
> simultaneously in both forums lead to exclusion? 

Of course not.  The rule is no cross-posting.
> 
> e) Sectarianism has been mentioned as a problem. Will we be given a
> definition, or allowed to discuss a definition, before the concept is
> invoked to exclude people?

I don't know.  It hasn't been raised as being a current problem.  It is
stated as the positive desire of this list to be non-sectarian. 
 
Someone said last week that "M2 is still in the womb".  I think that is true 
more now than ever.  

Give us some time.

Lisa



--- End of forwarded message from Fork Collective <forks-AT-jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU>



     --- from list marxism2-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---